Related Experiment Videos
Modified excised teat model for laboratory screening of teat dips
Journal of Dairy Science
|September 1, 1981
Summary
Physical and chemical treatments failed to eliminate teat microbes. Researchers found Edwards and NPC agars superior for Streptococcus agalactiae recovery from excised teats.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Microbiology
- Bacteriology
Background:
- Indigenous microorganisms on excised teats hinder accurate challenge culture enumeration on nonselective media.
- Effective methods are needed to reduce microbial contamination for reliable Streptococcus agalactiae studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate physical and chemical treatments for reducing microbial load on excised teats.
- To identify selective and differential media for optimal Streptococcus agalactiae recovery.
- To compare different methods for recovering Streptococcus agalactiae from excised teats.
Main Methods:
- Excised teats underwent physical (autoclaving, boiling, microwaving) and chemical (sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, iodophor) treatments.
- Selective media (Edwards, NPC) were screened for Streptococcus agalactiae recovery and bacterial contamination.
- Recovery methods (hand agitation, stomaching, swabbing, syringe rinsing) and time intervals between challenge and teat dip exposure were assessed.
Main Results:
- Physical and chemical treatments were unsuitable for reducing microbial contamination.
- Edwards and NPC agars demonstrated superior recovery of Streptococcus agalactiae.
- Hand agitation and stomaching in neutralizer were the most effective recovery methods.
- A 1-minute or less interval between challenge and teat dip exposure was effective.
Conclusions:
- Selective media, particularly Edwards and NPC agars, are crucial for reliable Streptococcus agalactiae enumeration from excised teats.
- Mechanical methods like hand agitation or stomaching are preferred for sample processing.
- Optimized time intervals enhance experimental efficiency without compromising results.