Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interrogation and interview: strategies for obtaining clinical data

E W Linfors, F A Neelon

    The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
    |July 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Self perception in anorexia nervosa.

    North Carolina medical journal·2001
    Same author

    Primary care providers. The view from where I stand.

    North Carolina medical journal·1999
    Same author

    Images in clinical medicine. The Babinski sign.

    The New England journal of medicine·1999
    Same author

    Osler and Ernulf's curse.

    Lancet (London, England)·1998
    Same author

    Behind the surgery doors. A look at what English general practitioners do.

    North Carolina medical journal·1996
    Same author

    The fall of the house of medicine?

    North Carolina medical journal·1995

    An open-ended patient interview effectively identifies most clinically significant health problems. Adding a structured questionnaire interrogates few additional important issues and is often unnecessary for comprehensive patient assessment.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Medicine
    • Patient Assessment

    Background:

    • Accurate identification of patient health problems is crucial for effective medical care.
    • Traditional assessment methods may vary in their ability to capture the full spectrum of patient concerns.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy of open-ended interviews versus structured questionnaires in identifying clinically important patient health problems.
    • To determine the added value of structured questionnaires when used in conjunction with open-ended interviews.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducted an assessment of 55 outpatients.
    • Recorded health problems identified through both open-ended interviews and structured questionnaires.
    • Analyzed the number and type of problems identified by each method and their clinical significance.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • A combined approach identified 269 clinically important problems.
    • Open-ended interviews identified 74% of all problems, with 14% identified exclusively by this method.
    • Structured questionnaires identified 26% of problems, but only 38% of these were considered clinically important and acted upon.

    Conclusions:

    • Open-ended interviews are highly effective in detecting significant patient health issues.
    • The addition of lengthy, structured questionnaires provides minimal additional clinically relevant information.
    • Routine use of structured questionnaires may be an inefficient use of resources in patient assessment.