Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical limitations in relation to sample size

C E Land

    Environmental Health Perspectives
    |December 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Estimating cancer risks from low carcinogen doses, like radiation, is statistically challenging. Current methods yield controversial, unstable, or arbitrary risk estimates due to data limitations and model uncertainties.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Circulating sex hormones and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of 13 studies.

    British journal of cancer·2011
    Same author

    Photoinduced currents in PZT thin films.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Radiation dose to the brain and subsequent risk of developing brain tumors in pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures.

    Radiation research·2008
    Same author

    Ultrasound-detected thyroid nodule prevalence and radiation dose from fallout.

    Radiation research·2008
    Same author

    [No convincing evidence for a causal relationship between childhood nasopharyngeal radium irradiation and head-neck tumors or hormone-related disorders later in life; a retrospective cohort study].

    Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2005
    Same author

    Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women.

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2003
    Same journal

    A New Start.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Health
    • Toxicology
    • Radiation Carcinogenesis

    Background:

    • Estimating cancer risks from low carcinogen exposure presents significant statistical challenges.
    • Radiation carcinogenesis is well-studied, yet low-dose risk estimates remain highly controversial, with disagreements often exceeding 100-fold.
    • Direct estimation from low-dose population data is typically infeasible due to insufficient sample sizes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To illustrate the statistical difficulties in estimating cancer risks from low doses of carcinogens.
    • To highlight the controversies and limitations in current low-dose risk assessment methodologies, particularly for ionizing radiation.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of statistical challenges in dose-response modeling for carcinogens.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of curve-fitting techniques and their reliance on dose-response models.
  • Discussion of the impact of biological mechanism knowledge on model selection.

    • Main Results:

    • Direct estimation of low-dose cancer risk is often impracticable due to sample size constraints.
    • Curve-fitting methods for risk estimation require simple models for statistical stability, which are often not biologically justified.
    • A frequent trade-off exists between statistically unstable estimates from general models and stable but potentially arbitrary estimates from simplified models.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate statistical estimation of cancer risks at low carcinogen doses is inherently difficult.
    • Current methodologies for low-dose risk assessment, especially for radiation, involve significant uncertainties and arbitrary assumptions.
    • Further research into carcinogenesis mechanisms is needed to improve the reliability of low-dose risk estimates.