Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The effect of refractive error on size constancy and shape constancy

H W Leibowitz, S B Wilcox, R B Post

    Perception
    |January 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Can normal outdoor activities be carried out during civil twilight?

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Nonoperatively treated type A spinal fractures: mid-term versus long-term functional outcome.

    International orthopaedics·2008
    Same author

    Return to work and quality of life in severely injured patients.

    Disability and rehabilitation·2006
    Same author

    Functional outcome 5 years after non-operative treatment of type A spinal fractures.

    European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2005
    Same author

    Sagittal range of motion after a spinal fracture: does ROM correlate with functional outcome?

    European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2004
    Same author

    Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device.

    Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2004
    Same journal

    Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

    Perception·2026
    See all related articles

    Refractive error significantly impacts shape constancy but not size constancy. Visual cues from peripheral fields aid size perception, while foveal cues are crucial for shape constancy.

    Area of Science:

    • Visual perception
    • Psychophysics
    • Optometry

    Background:

    • Perceptual constancy, including size and shape constancy, is crucial for stable object recognition.
    • Refractive errors, such as myopia and hyperopia, can alter visual input and potentially affect perceptual processes.
    • Understanding how visual clarity influences these constancies is important for visual science and clinical applications.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the differential effects of refractive error on size constancy and shape constancy.
    • To elucidate the specific visual cues and mechanisms underlying each type of perceptual constancy.
    • To determine the impact of blur (refractive error) on the reliability of these constancies.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants' ability to maintain size and shape constancy was assessed under varying degrees of induced refractive error (blur).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Controlled visual stimuli were presented to systematically manipulate the clarity of the visual input.
  • Quantitative measures were used to evaluate the degree of constancy under different blur conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • A refractive error of 1.5 diopters significantly impaired shape constancy.
    • However, 3.0 diopters of blur did not affect size constancy.
    • These findings suggest distinct mechanisms for size and shape constancy.

    Conclusions:

    • Size constancy relies on cues from the peripheral visual field, which are less affected by central blur.
    • Shape constancy is more dependent on foveal cues like texture and stereopsis, making it vulnerable to refractive error.
    • The study highlights the complex and distinct neural pathways involved in maintaining stable visual perception despite changes in retinal image quality.