Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Silastic sponge implants in retinal detachment surgery

P L Schwartz, P J Maris, C E Maris

    Annals of Ophthalmology
    |September 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Brief problem-solving questions in medical school examinations: is it necessary for students to explain their answers?

    Medical education·1999
    Same author

    Curriculum reform at the University of Otago Medical School.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1999
    Same author

    S.T.E.P.: students transitioning effectively into practice.

    Journal of pediatric nursing·1999
    Same author

    Effect of remedial tutorial help on students who fail in-course assessments.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1998
    Same author

    Promoting small-group teaching through funding changes.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1998
    Same author

    Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: I. Paper-based, whole class.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1998
    Same journal

    Ocular toxicity of systemic chemotherapy with megadoses of carmustine and mitomycin.

    Annals of ophthalmology·1994
    Same journal

    Congenital intrastromal epithelial cyst of the iris.

    Annals of ophthalmology·1994
    Same journal

    Diagnosis and treatment of orbital hemorrhagic lesions.

    Annals of ophthalmology·1994
    Same journal

    Clinical features of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

    Annals of ophthalmology·1994
    Same journal

    The closed chamber slipping suture technique for iris repair.

    Annals of ophthalmology·1994
    Same journal

    The effect of gravity on the amplitude of accommodation.

    Annals of ophthalmology·1994
    See all related articles

    Silastic sponge implants achieved a 94% primary and 95% overall reattachment rate for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. This safe and effective procedure had a low 1% redetachment rate, with most failures due to massive periretinal proliferation.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Retinal Surgery

    Background:

    • Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a serious condition requiring surgical intervention.
    • Silastic sponge implants are a common surgical method for RRD repair.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Silastic sponge implants for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.

    Main Methods:

    • A retrospective review of 200 consecutive primary RRD cases repaired with Silastic sponge implants.
    • Analysis of primary and overall reattachment rates, redetachment rates, and complications.

    Main Results:

    • Achieved a 94% primary reattachment rate and a 95% overall reattachment rate.
    • A low redetachment rate of approximately 1% was observed.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The incidence of massive periretinal proliferation (MPP) was 4%, accounting for most failures. No implant extrusion or erosion occurred, with only one late infection requiring removal.

    • Conclusions:

    • Silastic sponge implants are a safe and effective surgical option for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
    • The procedure demonstrates high success rates with minimal complications.
    • Massive periretinal proliferation remains a significant factor in surgical failure.