Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing the risks of cancer

P N Lee

    Cancer Detection and Prevention
    |January 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary

    Cancer mortality trends do not support an epidemic linked to environmental toxins. Occupational factors, including asbestos exposure, appear to have minimal impact compared to nutrition, which is likely a more significant cancer risk.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Modeling the impact of changes in tobacco use on individual disease risks.

    Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2018
    Same author

    Daytime sleepiness and sleep quality among Malaysian medical students.

    The Medical journal of Malaysia·2010
    Same author

    Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring IQ.

    International journal of epidemiology·2006
    Same author

    Response to E Yano and S Chapman.

    Tobacco control·2005
    Same author

    Utilization of inpatient care and its determinants among persons with intellectual disabilities in day care centres in Taiwan.

    Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2004
    Same author

    Pax6 in the sepiolid squid Euprymna scolopes: evidence for a role in eye, sensory organ and brain development.

    Mechanisms of development·2003

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Health
    • Occupational Health
    • Cancer Epidemiology

    Background:

    • Recent claims suggest a rising cancer epidemic driven by environmental chemical and physical agents.
    • Concerns exist regarding occupational exposures, such as asbestos, and their contribution to cancer rates.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the evidence behind claims of an increasing cancer epidemic due to environmental factors.
    • To reassess the impact of occupational exposures on cancer mortality trends.
    • To compare the relative importance of occupational versus nutritional factors in cancer etiology.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of cancer mortality rate trends.
    • Statistical adjustment for confounding factors like smoking and diagnostic changes.
    • Review and critique of existing estimates on occupational cancer risks.

    Main Results:

    • Cancer mortality trends do not indicate a significant increase attributable to occupational factors after accounting for smoking and diagnostic shifts.
    • Previous estimates of cancer increases from asbestos exposure are found to be substantially overestimated.
    • Nutritional factors are presented as likely playing a more substantial role in cancer development than occupational exposures.

    Conclusions:

    • The purported cancer epidemic linked to environmental agents is not well-supported by current mortality data.
    • Occupational exposures, including asbestos, are unlikely to be major drivers of current cancer trends.
    • Diet and nutrition represent a more critical area for cancer prevention and research.

    Related Experiment Videos