Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Abortion: why the arguments fail

S Hauerwas

    Hospital Progress
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Response to the 'Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care'.

    Christian bioethics·2002
    Same author

    Communitarians and medical ethicists: or "why I am none of the above".

    Christian scholar's review·1994
    Same author

    Why I am neither a communitarian nor a medical ethicist.

    The Hastings Center report·1993
    Same author

    Catholicism and ethics: a reply to the editorial entitled "Sobering thoughts".

    North Carolina medical journal·1987
    Same author

    Medical care for the poor: finite resources, infinite need.

    Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)·1985
    Same author

    Reflections on suffering, death and medicine.

    Ethics in science & medicine·1979
    Same journal

    The danger of exploiting student nurses.

    Hospital progress·2010
    Same journal

    Organizing the personnel service.

    Hospital progress·2010
    Same journal

    When a nun becomes a patient; the teaching Sister as a patient.

    Hospital progress·2010
    Same journal

    When a nun becomes a patient; the hospital Sister as a patient.

    Hospital progress·2010
    Same journal

    Personnel policies and conditions of service; the personnel of the nursing department of the Catholic hospital.

    Hospital progress·2010
    Same journal

    The Hospital Survey and Construction Act (S.-191).

    Hospital progress·2010
    See all related articles

    Christians have not adequately explained why abortion conflicts with their faith. The focus should shift from debating the start of life to demonstrating how a Christian life, acknowledging God as the Lord of life, renders abortion unthinkable.

    Area of Science:

    • Theology
    • Christian Ethics

    Background:

    • Existing Christian arguments against abortion often center on when life begins.
    • These arguments have not been persuasive in demonstrating abortion as an affront to Christian convictions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose an alternative theological framework for opposing abortion within Christianity.
    • To shift the basis of Christian opposition to abortion from biological definitions to theological principles.

    Main Methods:

    • Theological analysis of Christian teachings on life and God's sovereignty.
    • Ethical reasoning based on the concept of God as the Lord of life.

    Main Results:

    • The argument that God is the Lord of life provides a more robust foundation for opposing abortion.
    Keywords:
    Abortion, Induced--religious aspectsAttitude--religious aspectsBehaviorCultureEthicsFamily Planning--religious aspectsFertility Control, PostconceptionPhilosophical OverviewPolitical FactorsPsychological FactorsPsychosocial Factors

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Focusing on Christianity as a way of life, rather than specific biological timelines, strengthens the Christian stance against abortion.
  • Conclusions:

    • Christian opposition to abortion should be rooted in the theological principle of God's absolute lordship over life.
    • A comprehensive Christian ethic, emphasizing life as a divine gift and responsibility, makes abortion unthinkable.