Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extraperitoneal cesarean section revisited

H C Haesslein, R C Goodlin

    Obstetrics and Gynecology
    |February 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Extraperitoneal cesarean sections were not beneficial for high-risk patients. Prophylactic antibiotics and standard intraperitoneal cesarean sections are preferred, even with suspected infection.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Fetal Heart Rate Response to Maternal Exercise Testing.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Is it time to move on?

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2001
    Same author

    Preeclampsia and fetal growth.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2001
    Same author

    Obstetrics for the new millennium.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2001
    Same author

    Were there any misdiagnoses?

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2000
    Same author

    What is the meaning of authorship?

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2000
    Same journal

    A Quality-Improvement Study Evaluating Three Postpartum Prophylactic Oxytocin Rates and Blood Loss After Vaginal Birth.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    The Effects of Climate Change on Obstetric and Gynecologic Health.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    PUBLICATIONS: July 2026.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: Correction.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    A Contemporary View of Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Correction.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    In Reply.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Surgical Infection Prevention

    Background:

    • Cesarean sections carry risks of infection and complications, particularly in high-risk patients.
    • Extraperitoneal cesarean section was considered as a potentially safer alternative to reduce infectious complications.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the effectiveness of extraperitoneal cesarean section in reducing infections and complications in high-risk patients.
    • To compare outcomes between extraperitoneal and standard intraperitoneal cesarean sections in a high-risk population.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of 186 primary cesarean sections in high-risk patients.
    • Assessment of infection incidence and other complications based on surgical approach.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Patients who theoretically would benefit most from extraperitoneal approach were not candidates.
    • Patients who were candidates for extraperitoneal approach did well with standard intraperitoneal technique.
    • Prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced febrile morbidity, except in severe toxemia cases.
    • Extraperitoneal technique could have missed significant unsuspected pathologic conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Extraperitoneal cesarean section is not superior to standard intraperitoneal cesarean section for high-risk patients.
    • Prophylactic antibiotics and standard intraperitoneal cesarean sections are recommended, even in cases of apparent amnionitis.