Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recertification. A continuing debate

J D Trobe, M L Rubin, S M Wolfe

    Survey of Ophthalmology
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Physician recertification is debated, with some arguing it

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Temperature gradient scale length measurement: A high accuracy application of electron cyclotron emission without calibration.

    The Review of scientific instruments·2016
    Same author

    Effects of magnetic shear on toroidal rotation in tokamak plasmas with lower hybrid current drive.

    Physical review letters·2013
    Same author

    X-ray imaging crystal spectroscopy for use in plasma transport research.

    The Review of scientific instruments·2012
    Same author

    Energetic ion loss detector on the Alcator C-Mod tokamak.

    The Review of scientific instruments·2012
    Same author

    Rotation reversal bifurcation and energy confinement saturation in tokamak Ohmic L-mode plasmas.

    Physical review letters·2012
    Same author

    Serous retinal detachment in hypertensive posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2011
    Same journal

    Trends in pediatric uveitis: A systematic review and meta-epidemiological investigation of geographic, economic, and climate factors.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Efficacy and safety of different intraocular therapies for non-infectious uveitis: A network meta-analysis.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Macular telangiectasia masqueraders.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Utilization of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in childhood glaucoma: A systematic review.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome: Clinical and imaging features, diagnostic differentiation and therapeutic strategies.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Prognostic factors and postoperative outcomes in pediatric cataract patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Professional Standards
    • Healthcare Policy

    Background:

    • Physician recertification is a contentious issue, often met with resistance from medical practitioners.
    • Patient advocacy groups and the public increasingly demand tangible evidence of physicians' up-to-date medical knowledge and skills.
    • The growing body of medical information necessitates ongoing evaluation of physician competency.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the arguments surrounding mandatory physician recertification.
    • To present differing expert opinions on the value and necessity of recertification examinations.

    Main Methods:

    • The abstract presents a discussion of expert opinions rather than empirical research.
    • It highlights the perspectives of Dr. Melvin Rubin and Dr. Sidney Wolfe on recertification.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The core method involves contrasting viewpoints on the efficacy and justification of recertification.

    • Main Results:

    • Dr. Rubin questions the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of recertification tests, citing physician "mental anguish."
    • Dr. Wolfe advocates for examinations as a crucial, albeit potentially insufficient, measure to ensure physicians maintain knowledge and skills.
    • The discussion reveals a conflict between physician burden and public demand for assurance of competence.

    Conclusions:

    • There is no consensus on the utility of recertification examinations as a sole guarantee of clinical excellence.
    • Balancing the need for public assurance with the demands on physicians remains a key challenge in medical professional standards.
    • Further dialogue is needed to determine effective methods for ensuring ongoing physician competency in a rapidly evolving medical landscape.