Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Drainage after cholecystectomy

C P Chilton, C V Mann

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Most patients undergoing simple cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal) do not require abdominal drains due to low drainage volumes. Non-drainage may also be safe for more complex procedures.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Classification of internal haemorrhoids: a discussion paper.

    Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2004
    Same author

    Results of holmium laser resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

    Journal of endourology·2000
    Same author

    The results at nine to twelve years of the use of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem.

    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2000
    Same author

    High dose intravenous oestrogen (fosfestrol) in the treatment of symptomatic, metastatic, hormone-refractory carcinoma of the prostate.

    International urology and nephrology·1998
    Same author

    The results of holmium laser resection of the prostate.

    British journal of urology·1998
    Same author

    The role of colour Doppler imaging in the management of Peyronie's disease.

    British journal of urology·1998
    Same journal

    A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in a low-middle-income country setting.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    Designing sustainable robotic surgery for NHS scale-up: direct electricity measurement and an implementation-ready energy mitigation bundle in colorectal cancer resections.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    Trends and causes of litigation in paediatric surgery within the National Health Service (NHS) England: a 19-year analysis.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    Laparoscopic-assisted ERCP is a safe procedure with good outcomes: experience from a single high-volume upper GI unit.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    The incidence of complex regional pain syndrome following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre observational study of 1,026 patients with no cases identified according to the Budapest criteria.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    Can a generic fracture fixation assessment tool be used to assess quality of distal radius fracture fixation, and predict fixation failure?

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Gastroenterology
    • Surgical Innovation
    • Clinical Outcomes

    Background:

    • Abdominal drains are commonly used after cholecystectomy.
    • The necessity and impact of drains on patient recovery are debated.
    • Optimizing surgical procedures to minimize patient discomfort and complications is a key goal.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the necessity of abdominal drains in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.
    • To compare drainage volumes and postoperative outcomes between simple cholecystectomy and cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration.
    • To assess the safety and efficacy of non-drainage policies in specific surgical scenarios.

    Main Methods:

    • Prospective study comparing two groups of patients: simple cholecystectomy (n=61) and cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration (n=12).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurement of abdominal drain volumes over 5 days post-operation.
  • Observation and comparison of postoperative courses, including pain and complications.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean total drainage after simple cholecystectomy was 135 ml over 5 days.
    • Mean total drainage after cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration was 94 ml over 5 days.
    • Low drainage volumes suggest non-drainage may be suitable for a majority of simple elective cholecystectomy patients.

    Conclusions:

    • The majority of patients undergoing simple elective cholecystectomy may not require abdominal drains.
    • Non-drainage appears to be a safe approach for cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration and other combined procedures.
    • The RediVac drain system, if used, offers efficiency with reduced pain and complications compared to other systems.