Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informed consent 1980

R S Brittain

    Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
    |March 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    Patient autonomy in medical decisions is legally protected, requiring informed consent. Enhancing the patient-physician relationship through clear communication is crucial for truly informed decision-making and proper documentation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Goodpasture's syndrome. Treatment failure with azathioprine.

    JAMA·1966
    Same author

    ACCIDENTAL HEPATIC ARTERY LIGATION IN HUMANS.

    American journal of surgery·1964
    Same author

    USE OF LIVING DONORS FOR RENAL HOMOTRANSPLANTATION.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1964
    Same author

    PROBLEMS IN RENAL HOMOTRANSPLANTATION.

    JAMA·1964
    Same author

    RENAL HOMOGRAFTS IN PATIENTS WITH MAJOR DONOR-RECIPIENT BLOOD GROUP INCOMPATIBILITIES.

    Surgery·1964
    Same author

    HOMOTRANSPLANTATION OF THE LIVER IN HUMANS.

    Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics·1963

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Legal Medicine
    • Patient Rights

    Background:

    • Patient consent for medical procedures is a long-standing legal right.
    • Informed consent ensures patients make autonomous decisions about their healthcare.
    • Traditional methods may not fully achieve genuine informed consent.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the complexities of obtaining truly informed patient consent.
    • To emphasize the importance of the patient-physician relationship in decision-making.
    • To guide physicians in documenting informed consent effectively.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal precedents regarding patient consent.
    • Analysis of the patient-physician communication dynamic.
    • Consideration of documentation strategies for informed consent.

    Main Results:

    • Patient consent rights are well-established legally.
    • Achieving truly informed consent relies on a robust patient-physician relationship.
    • Mechanical solutions are insufficient for the nuances of informed consent.

    Conclusions:

    • The patient-physician relationship is key to informed consent.
    • Physicians must foster open information exchange for patient autonomy.
    • Effective documentation of informed consent requires careful consideration by healthcare providers.
    Keywords:
    Canterbury v. Spence

    Related Experiment Videos