Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

VIth axis for DSM-III: psychodynamic evaluation

T B Karasu, A E Skodol

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |May 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Relating DSM-5 section III personality traits to section II personality disorder diagnoses.

    Psychological medicine·2015
    Same author

    Thought disorder in the meta-structure of psychopathology.

    Psychological medicine·2012
    Same author

    Combined role of childhood maltreatment, family history, and gender in the risk for alcohol dependence.

    Psychological medicine·2012
    Same author

    The worst of times, the best of times : psychotherapy in the 1990s.

    The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2012
    Same author

    Strategies of therapist interventions : a preliminary empirical study.

    The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2012
    Same author

    Determinants of outpatients' satisfaction with therapists : relation to outcome.

    The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2012
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: President-Elect Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: CEO and Medical Director's Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Reports to the Membership.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Convergent Metabolic Dysregulations But Divergent Contributing Pathways Across Severe Mental Disorders: The Power of Combining Genetics and Metabolomics.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: Presidential Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Represcribing Previously Used Antipsychotics: Response to So.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    See all related articles

    The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) lacks crucial details for psychotherapy treatment planning. Mental health professionals suggest a new treatment-focused axis to improve diagnostic utility in clinical practice.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychotherapy Research

    Background:

    • The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) introduced a multiaxial system, prompting debate on its clinical utility.
    • Psychotherapists have expressed concerns that the DSM-III's diagnostic categories do not adequately inform treatment planning.
    • The validity of a diagnostic system is significantly influenced by its clinical usefulness.

    Observation:

    • This study examines the limitations of the DSM-III in guiding psychotherapy for patients with long-standing depressed mood.
    • Three case studies illustrate how the current DSM-III framework falls short in providing specific treatment recommendations.
    • Practicing psychotherapists find the DSM-III's diagnostic discriminations insufficient for tailoring psychotherapy interventions.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Findings:

    • The DSM-III's multiaxial system, while comprehensive, omits critical information needed for effective psychotherapy.
    • Diagnostic labels within the DSM-III do not consistently translate into actionable treatment strategies for complex cases.
    • The current diagnostic structure limits the ability of clinicians to personalize treatment plans.

    Implications:

    • There is a need for a supplementary, treatment-oriented axis to enhance the DSM-III's clinical applicability.
    • Integrating treatment-specific information into diagnostic systems can improve therapeutic outcomes.
    • Future revisions of diagnostic manuals should prioritize clinical utility and treatment planning alongside diagnostic accuracy.