Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The crossover experiment for clinical trials

B W Brown

    Biometrics
    |March 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The two-period crossover design offers statistical precision for clinical trials but is sensitive to carryover effects. Testing for these effects within the design is possible but not cost-effective.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The Child Abuse Potential Inventory and pregnancy outcome in expectant adolescent mothers.

    Child abuse & neglect·2002
    Same author

    Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes.

    Medical care·2001
    Same author

    Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2001
    Same author

    Physical activity outcomes of CHAMPS II: a physical activity promotion program for older adults.

    The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2001
    Same author

    The development of breast carcinoma in women with thyroid carcinoma.

    Cancer·2001
    Same author

    High-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic-cell transplantation for follicular lymphoma beyond first remission: the Stanford University experience.

    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation·2001
    Same journal

    Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

    Biometrics·2026
    Same journal

    A Bayesian phase I/II platform design with data augmentation accounting for delayed outcomes.

    Biometrics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Trial Design
    • Biostatistics
    • Pharmacoeconomics

    Background:

    • The two-period crossover design is a common methodology in clinical trials.
    • Evaluating its statistical precision and cost-effectiveness against simpler designs is crucial for optimal trial planning.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the statistical precision and cost of the two-period crossover design with other simple clinical trial designs.
    • To assess the sensitivity of the crossover design to bias arising from carryover effects.
    • To investigate the feasibility and economic viability of using crossover data to detect carryover effects.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of statistical precision and cost across different clinical trial designs.
    • Sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of carryover effects on crossover trial outcomes.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Economic evaluation of methods for detecting carryover effects within crossover designs.

    • Main Results:

    • The two-period crossover design demonstrates specific statistical precision advantages.
    • The design is susceptible to bias when carryover effects are present.
    • Detecting carryover effects using crossover data is statistically feasible but economically impractical.

    Conclusions:

    • The two-period crossover design is a valuable tool in clinical trials, offering precision but requiring careful consideration of potential carryover effects.
    • While testing for carryover effects is possible, its uneconomical nature suggests alternative strategies for managing such biases.
    • Researchers must weigh the benefits of crossover designs against the risks and costs associated with carryover effects.