Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Some efficiency comments on group sizes in study design

J H Lubin

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |April 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Increasing one group size in binary response studies can improve efficiency. Doubling efficiency is possible when one group is three times larger than the other, but gains diminish beyond sixfold increases.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Investing in prospective cohorts for etiologic study of occupational exposures.

    American journal of industrial medicine·2015
    Same author

    Misunderstandings in the misconception on the use of pack-years in analysis of smoking.

    British journal of cancer·2013
    Same author

    GSTM1 null and NAT2 slow acetylation genotypes, smoking intensity and bladder cancer risk: results from the New England bladder cancer study and NAT2 meta-analysis.

    Carcinogenesis·2010
    Same author

    The statistical power of epidemiological studies analyzing the relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and cancer, with special reference to childhood leukemia and natural background radiation.

    Radiation research·2010
    Same author

    Differential effects of smoking on lung cancer mortality before and after household stove improvement in Xuanwei, China.

    British journal of cancer·2010
    Same author

    Autoimmune thyroiditis and exposure to iodine 131 in the Ukrainian cohort study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases after the Chornobyl accident: results from the first screening cycle (1998-2000).

    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2006
    Same journal

    A decision-theoretic framework for uncertainty quantification in epidemiological modelling.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    U.S. cardiovascular mortality before and during COVID-19: CDC WONDER vs GBD comparison.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Design and procedures for the greenness, cognitive performance and vascular outcomes in the northern Manhattan study (NOMAS-greenness).

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trial Design

    Background:

    • Standard sample size calculations exist for binary response comparisons between two groups.
    • Often, increasing the size of one group requires minimal additional resources.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the efficiency gains from unequal group sizes in binary response studies.
    • To provide guidance on optimal group size ratios for maximizing statistical efficiency.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of asymptotic variance of the logarithm of the odds ratio.
    • Graphical assessment of efficiency gains based on varying group size ratios.

    Main Results:

    • Efficiency gains are dependent on response probabilities.
    • In certain scenarios, a 3:1 group size ratio can double efficiency.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Efficiency gains plateau and are seldom advantageous beyond a 6:1 ratio.

    • Conclusions:

    • Unequal group sizes can significantly enhance study efficiency.
    • Optimal group size ratios, particularly around 3:1, should be considered in study design.
    • Graphical tools can aid in evaluating potential efficiency improvements.