Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research design: general designs

R L Mikeal

    American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
    |April 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study analyzes common research designs, emphasizing that only random assignment in experimental designs can logically prove causality. Other designs like cohort or case-control studies have limitations in determining cause-and-effect relationships.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Consultant evaluation of a hospital medication system: analysis of the existing system.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1984
    Same author

    Consultant evaluation of a hospital medication system: synthesis of a new system.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1984
    Same author

    Consultant evaluation of a hospital medication system: implementation and evaluation of the new system.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1984
    Same author

    Medication errors in nursing homes and small hospitals.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1982
    Same author

    Experimental investigation of glucocorticoid-induced myopathy in the dog.

    Experimental neurology·1980
    Same author

    Subclinical myopathy associated with hyperadrenocorticism in the dog.

    Veterinary pathology·1980

    Area of Science:

    • Research Methodology
    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Widely used research designs are foundational to scientific inquiry.
    • Understanding the strengths and limitations of various designs is crucial for valid scientific conclusions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present conceptual foundations of common research designs.
    • To analyze various design models and their implications for causal inference.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of conceptual foundations for research designs.
    • Evaluation of design models including stimulus-response, time-order, sampling, allocation, and analysis.
    • Assessment of generalization capabilities and causal inference potential.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Symbolization, seriation, and classification studies have limited generalizability.
    • Cohort and case-control studies cannot definitively determine causality.
    • Only designs with random assignment of units and conditions can logically prove cause.

    Conclusions:

    • Random assignment is essential for establishing causality in research.
    • Crossover designs do not offer advantages and may introduce invalidity.
    • Careful selection of research design is critical for valid scientific findings.