Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A test object for assessing image quality in mammography

D R White, A K Tucker

    The British Journal of Radiology
    |April 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Johnson Noise <i>Thermometry</i>.

    Measurement science & technology·2024
    Same author

    The Boltzmann project.

    Metrologia·2019
    Same author

    The kelvin redefinition and its mise en pratique.

    Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2016
    Same author

    Electrical substitution radiometry with feedback control: optimization of measurement time and resolution for repeated observations.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Response time and noise power gain of electrical substitution radiometers with feedback control.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Reflectometer for measuring the bidirectional reflectance of rough surfaces.

    Applied optics·2008
    Same journal

    Radioligand therapy for paediatric patients with solid tumours.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Vertebral computed tomography attenuation to case-find low bone density in people undergoing lung cancer screening.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Designing and manufacturing mammographic test objects presents challenges. A novel test object is introduced for assessing mammographic imaging quality, with results from various machine/film setups shown.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiology
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Mammography is crucial for breast cancer screening.
    • Ensuring high image quality in mammography is essential for accurate diagnosis.
    • Existing test objects may have limitations in comprehensively assessing mammographic performance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss the challenges in designing and manufacturing mammographic test objects.
    • To introduce a new test object for evaluating mammographic image quality.
    • To present performance data using the developed test object.

    Main Methods:

    • A detailed discussion of design and manufacturing considerations for mammographic phantoms.
    • Description of a newly developed mammographic test object.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Acquisition and analysis of mammographic images using different equipment and film combinations.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified inherent problems in the design and manufacture of mammographic test objects.
    • Demonstrated the utility of the described test object for image quality assessment.
    • Presented comparative results highlighting differences between optimal and suboptimal mammographic systems.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed test object is effective for evaluating mammographic image quality.
    • The findings underscore the importance of appropriate test objects for quality assurance in mammography.
    • Variations in mammographic equipment and film significantly impact image quality.