Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What is hazardous? What is safe?

J W Healy

    Environmental Health Perspectives
    |December 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Defining acceptable risk requires recognizing six key factors. These include the impossibility of absolute safety and the subjective nature of risk perception, influenced by societal benefits and individual judgment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Estimation of human gonadal Pu and Ce concentrations from animal data.

    Health physics·1989
    Same author

    H.M. Parker lecture. Radiation protection standards: a historical perspective.

    Health physics·1988
    Same author

    Plutonium in gonads: a summary of the current status.

    Health physics·1985
    Same author

    Plutonium partitioning among internal organs.

    Health physics·1984
    Same author

    The ICRP dose limitation system--solution or problem?

    Health physics·1982
    Same author

    Commitment, equivalent and collective.

    Health physics·1981
    Same journal

    A New Start.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Risk assessment and management
    • Decision-making in safety-critical systems

    Background:

    • Acceptable risk is a complex concept with multiple influencing factors.
    • Understanding these factors is crucial for effective decision-making in product and service design.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and discuss the principal factors defining acceptable risk.
    • To highlight the multifaceted nature of risk assessment beyond mere safety.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of six principal factors influencing risk perception and acceptance.
    • Discussion of the interplay between individual, societal, and contextual elements in risk evaluation.

    Main Results:

    • Identified six key factors: inherent unsafety, subjective risk standards, historical context of perception, need for compensatory benefits, divergence of societal vs. actual risk, and safety as one of many design considerations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasized that risk is not solely a technical issue but involves psychological and social dimensions.

    • Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive definition of acceptable risk must acknowledge these six factors.
    • Effective risk management requires integrating subjective perceptions, societal context, and benefits alongside objective safety data.