Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physicians' subjectivity in evaluating oxytocin challenge tests

T M Peck

    Obstetrics and Gynecology
    |July 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Childrens' distress during burn treatment is reduced by massage therapy.

    The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2001
    Same author

    Constant intravenous insulin infusion during labor and delivery in diabetes mellitus.

    Diabetes care·1982
    Same author

    Hematologic changes associated with pregnancy.

    Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·1979
    Same author

    A simple test for predicting pregnancy-induced hypertension.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·1977

    Maternal-fetal medicine physicians showed poor agreement on oxytocin challenge tests (OCTs). Fetal heart rate (FHR) accelerations, not OCT results, strongly predicted neonatal outcomes, highlighting their importance in antepartum monitoring.

    Area of Science:

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    • Fetal Monitoring

    Background:

    • The oxytocin challenge test (OCT) is used to assess fetal well-being.
    • Evaluating fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns is crucial for antepartum monitoring.
    • Inter-observer variability in interpreting FHR tests can impact clinical decisions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess inter-observer agreement among maternal-fetal medicine specialists on OCT interpretation.
    • To evaluate the correlation between OCT results, FHR reactivity, and neonatal outcomes.
    • To identify the most significant variable in antepartum FHR monitoring for predicting neonatal outcome.

    Main Methods:

    • Five maternal-fetal medicine physicians independently reviewed 50 OCTs.
    • Physicians assessed OCT results and FHR reactivity patterns.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Neonatal outcomes were correlated with the physicians' interpretations.

    • Main Results:

    • Considerable disagreement was observed among physicians regarding OCT interpretation (average agreement: 52%).
    • Significant disagreement also occurred in evaluating FHR reactivity patterns.
    • Majority agreement (≥3/5 physicians) on OCT or reactivity showed reasonable correlation with neonatal outcome.
    • FHR accelerations, irrespective of OCT results, demonstrated a strong correlation with neonatal outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • There is substantial inter-observer variability in interpreting OCTs and FHR reactivity.
    • The presence or absence of FHR accelerations is a highly significant predictor of neonatal outcome.
    • FHR acceleration patterns are the most critical variable in antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring.