Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Esophageal reconstruction

D B Skinner

    American Journal of Surgery
    |June 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    For esophageal reconstruction, stomach use is quick but risks aspiration and reflux. Intestinal segments (colon or jejunum) are preferred for benign conditions to avoid these late complications.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Tightrope walking without a safety net: American medical schools respond to the impact of the balanced Budget Act.

    Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research·1999
    Same author

    Massive hiatal hernias: the anatomic basis of repair.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·1998
    Same author

    En bloc esophagectomy improves survival for stage III esophageal cancer.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·1998
    Same author

    Shaping the revolution: thoracic surgeons and something more. Presidential address.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·1997
    Same author

    The age of managed care.

    Journal of the American College of Surgeons·1997
    Same author

    Editorial on combined therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·1997
    Same journal

    Innovative management of Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome (ACNES): A meta-analysis and introduction of a new robotic approach with patient-based algorithm.

    American journal of surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Does the risk outweigh the benefit? Clot progression, recanalization & complications of anticoagulation therapy in acute pancreatitis with concomitant splanchnic vein thrombosis.

    American journal of surgery·2026
    Same journal

    High and low body mass index and 90-day postoperative outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease undergoing abdominal surgery.

    American journal of surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Women with firearm injuries: A multicenter mixed-methods study.

    American journal of surgery·2026
    Same journal

    SBAS presidential address: A surgeon-scientist's journey from haptic science to digital performance metrics.

    American journal of surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Using Dr. Google and AI to stay informed.

    American journal of surgery·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Gastroenterology
    • Surgical Oncology
    • Thoracic Surgery

    Background:

    • Esophageal reconstruction is a complex surgical procedure.
    • Choosing the appropriate reconstruction method is crucial for patient outcomes.
    • Malignant and benign esophageal diseases present different challenges.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To summarize experience with 112 esophageal reconstructions in 108 patients.
    • To outline an overall philosophy for esophageal reconstruction.
    • To compare the outcomes of different reconstruction techniques.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of 112 esophageal reconstructions performed in 108 patients.
    • Analysis of complications associated with different reconstructive methods (stomach, colon, jejunum).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of long-term outcomes, including aspiration pneumonia and reflux esophagitis.

    • Main Results:

    • Stomach reconstruction is quick but associated with higher rates of aspiration pneumonia and reflux esophagitis.
    • Intestinal segments (colon or jejunum) reduce risks of aspiration and late esophagitis but carry a hazard of venous infarction.
    • For malignant disease, rapid reconstruction is prioritized; for benign disease, avoiding late complications is key.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of esophageal reconstruction depends on the underlying pathology (malignant vs. benign).
    • Intestinal segments are preferred for benign conditions due to lower rates of long-term complications.
    • While stomach reconstruction offers speed, its late complications necessitate careful consideration.