Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Nodular scleroderma]

J Dimitrova, L Molcho, C Rueva

    Zeitschrift Fur Hautkrankheiten
    |April 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study differentiates between sclerodermia nodularis and keloid in a 40-year-old patient. Clinical and histological findings were used to confirm the diagnosis.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Calcinosis cutis in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2003
    Same author

    Cutaneous aspects of Down syndrome.

    Cutis·2001
    Same author

    Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus presenting with generalized poikiloderma.

    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2000
    Same author

    Facial bullous systemic lupus erythematosus.

    International journal of dermatology·1997
    Same author

    Tuberculosis verrucosa cutis associated with lupus vulgaris.

    International journal of dermatology·1993
    Same author

    Candida granuloma and sarcoidosis.

    Mycoses·1993

    Area of Science:

    • Dermatology
    • Pathology

    Background:

    • Sclerodermia nodularis and keloid are distinct dermatological conditions.
    • Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate patient management.

    Observation:

    • A 40-year-old patient presented with clinical features suggestive of sclerodermia nodularis.
    • The patient's presentation required careful evaluation to distinguish between sclerodermia nodularis and keloid.

    Findings:

    • Both clinical examination and histological analysis were performed.
    • The diagnostic process aimed to differentiate between sclerodermia nodularis and keloid based on presented evidence.

    Implications:

    • This case highlights the importance of integrating clinical and histological data for accurate diagnosis.
    • Distinguishing between these conditions ensures correct treatment strategies and patient outcomes.