Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A simplified mercury switch head-control biofeedback device

F P Maloney

    Biofeedback and Self-Regulation
    |June 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The emerging medical/industrial complex. The industrialization of medicine.

    Physician executive·1998
    Same author

    Goal attainment scaling.

    Physical therapy·1993
    Same author

    Methodologic and compliance issues in postcoronary bypass surgery subjects.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·1990
    Same author

    Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and cancer rehabilitation. 5. Cancer rehabilitation: management of pain, neurologic and other clinical problems.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·1990
    Same author

    Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and cancer rehabilitation. 4. Cancer rehabilitation: principles and psychosocial aspects.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·1990
    Same author

    Effect of forced running on rat skeletal muscle with acrylamide neuropathy.

    Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine·1990
    Same journal

    Good news--bad press: applied psychophysiology in cardiovascular disorders.

    Biofeedback and self-regulation·1996
    Same journal

    Treatment of a depressive disorder patient with EEG-driven photic stimulation.

    Biofeedback and self-regulation·1996
    Same journal

    The effects of breathing pattern training on ventilatory function in patients with COPD.

    Biofeedback and self-regulation·1996
    Same journal

    Alpha brainwave training and perception of time passing: preliminary findings.

    Biofeedback and self-regulation·1996
    Same journal

    Biodesensitization: biofeedback-controlled systematic desensitization of the stress response to infant crying.

    Biofeedback and self-regulation·1996
    Same journal

    Awareness of physiological responding under stress and nonstress conditions in temporomandibular disorders.

    Biofeedback and self-regulation·1996
    See all related articles

    A simplified mercury switch device offers easy, quantifiable head control for various settings. This feedback method shows benefits without needing directional or visual signals, consistent with prior research.

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Rehabilitation Technology
    • Assistive Devices

    Background:

    • Head-control devices are crucial for individuals with limited mobility.
    • Existing technologies can be complex or costly.
    • Mercury switches offer a potentially simpler alternative for developing assistive technology.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To report a simplified mercury switch head-control device.
    • To assess its ease of duplication and quantitation.
    • To evaluate its utility in different settings and with varying feedback types.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a simplified head-control device utilizing mercury switches.
    • Testing the device's usability and quantitation capabilities.
    • Observing outcomes in six patients and two controls.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The mercury switch device is simple to duplicate and amenable to quantitation.
    • It demonstrated ease of use in home, school, and therapy settings.
    • Directionality and visual feedback were not essential for achieving benefits.
    • Results align with previous studies on mercury switch feedback.

    Conclusions:

    • A simplified mercury switch head-control device is a viable, user-friendly option.
    • Its effectiveness is demonstrated across various environments and patient groups.
    • This technology offers a cost-effective and accessible solution for head-controlled interfaces.