Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

For the 1980s: how small is too small?

S Schechner

    Clinics in Perinatology
    |March 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    For extremely low birth weight infants, less aggressive care may be better due to poor survival and quality of life outcomes. Healthcare providers should openly discuss intensive care risks and benefits with families.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Perinatal and neurobehavioral predictors of one-year outcome in infants less than or equal to 1500 grams.

    Seminars in perinatology·1982
    Same author

    Neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage: a serial computed tomography study.

    Journal of computer assisted tomography·1979
    Same author

    Evaluation of methods of assisted ventilation in hyaline membrane disease.

    Archives of disease in childhood·1978
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Neonatal Medicine
    • Perinatal Care
    • Infant Health

    Background:

    • Extremely low birth weight infants (<750 gm) face poor survival rates.
    • Surviving infants often experience a diminished quality of life.
    • Current intensive care approaches may not yield optimal outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the appropriateness of a less aggressive approach for very low birth weight infants.
    • To inform clinical decision-making regarding neonatal intensive care.

    Main Methods:

    • This is a conceptual discussion based on existing data and clinical experience.
    • No new empirical data were collected.

    Main Results:

    • A less aggressive approach appears warranted given the poor prognosis.
    Keywords:
    Empirical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Honest communication regarding risks and benefits of intensive care is crucial.

    • Conclusions:

    • Neonatal intensive care decisions for extremely low birth weight infants require careful consideration.
    • Open dialogue between healthcare providers and families is essential for informed consent and realistic expectations.