Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hearing protector performance--an update

P L Michael, G R Bienvenue

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
    |August 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study compares single-number and octave band methods for presenting hearing protector noise reduction data. It discusses the pros and cons of each approach for assessing noise exposure.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The AudioScope: a clinical tool for otoscopic and audiometric examination.

    Ear and hearing·1985
    Same author

    Reference threshold sound pressure levels for the Welch Allyn AudioScope.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1984
    Same author

    Permanent effects of noise exposure on results of a battery of hearing tests.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1980
    Same author

    Noise attenuation characteristics of the MX-41/AR and the Telephonics circumaural audiometric headsets.

    Journal of the American Audiology Society·1978
    Same author

    Loudness Discrimination Index (LDI): a test for the early detection of noise susceptible individuals.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1977
    Same author

    Real-ear threshold level comparisons between the telephonics TDH-39 earphone with a metal outer shell and the TDH-39, TDH-49, and TDH-50 earphones with plastic outer shells.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1977

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Occupational Health
    • Acoustics

    Background:

    • Noise exposure assessment has evolved, with A-weighted sound pressure levels (dBA) largely replacing octave band levels in the last decade.
    • Hearing protector noise reduction data presentation methods have varied to aid in calculating protected exposure levels.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe and compare single-number and octave band procedures for presenting hearing protector noise attenuation data.
    • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each data presentation method.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing methods for presenting hearing protector noise attenuation data.
    • Comparative analysis of single-number descriptors (e.g., dBA) and octave band level procedures.
    • Discussion of the practical implications for noise exposure assessment.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Single-number descriptors offer simplicity but may oversimplify complex noise environments.
    • Octave band procedures provide more detailed spectral information, allowing for more precise attenuation calculations.
    • The choice of method impacts the accuracy of estimated noise exposure levels when using hearing protection.

    Conclusions:

    • Both single-number and octave band methods have roles in hearing protector data presentation.
    • Understanding the limitations of each method is crucial for effective noise exposure assessment and hearing conservation.
    • Further research may refine methods for optimal noise reduction data representation.