Related Experiment Videos
Type A behavior pattern, sex role orientation, and psychological adjustment
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|August 1, 1980
Summary
The Type A behavior pattern, when combined with low masculinity, is linked to poor social adjustment, particularly in women. This suggests that traditional masculine traits may buffer the negative effects of Type A behavior.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Science
- Social Psychology
Background:
- The Type A behavior pattern, characterized by competitiveness and hostility, was initially considered adaptive.
- However, its adaptiveness may depend on an individual's sex role orientation.
- A lack of a masculine sex role orientation may hinder the successful functioning of Type A individuals, especially in interpersonal contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between Type A behavior, sex role orientation, and psychological adjustment.
- To explore whether a low masculine sex role orientation exacerbates negative outcomes for Type A individuals.
- To examine gender differences in the manifestation of these effects.
Main Methods:
- A study was conducted with 213 college students.
- Participants' Type A behavior patterns and sex role orientations were assessed.
- Measures of social self-esteem, social anxiety, and depression were utilized.
Main Results:
- A Type A behavioral style combined with a low masculine sex role orientation was associated with lower social self-esteem.
- This combination also correlated with higher social anxiety and depression.
- These maladjustment tendencies were more pronounced in women than in men.
Conclusions:
- The findings support the hypothesis that Type A behavior is maladaptive in the absence of a strong masculine sex role orientation.
- Interpersonal functioning appears particularly vulnerable to this interaction.
- Cultural expectations regarding gender roles may influence the expression of psychological distress in Type A individuals.