Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychosocial problems and outcome: an external validity study

B Berkman

    Health & Social Work
    |August 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Standardized screening of elderly patients' needs for social work assessment in primary care: use of the SF-36.

    Health & social work·2003
    Same author

    Use of standardized measures in agency based research and practice.

    Social work in health care·2002
    Same author

    Spirituality and quality of life in gynecologic oncology patients.

    Cancer practice·1998
    Same author

    The emerging health care world: implications for social work practice and education.

    Social work·1996
    Same author

    Assessment tools for general health care settings: PRIME-MD, OARS, and SF-36. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Health Disorders. Older Americans Resources and Services Questionnaire; Short Form-36.

    Health & social work·1996
    Same author

    Ambulatory elderly patients of primary care physicians: functional, psychosocial and environmental predictors of need for social work care management.

    Social work in health care·1996
    Same journal

    The Power of Social Prescribing in Addressing Social Determinants of Health.

    Health & social work·2026
    Same journal

    When Fraud Becomes the Frame: Medicaid, Power, and the Politics of Suspicion.

    Health & social work·2026
    Same journal

    Access to Maternity Care and Low Birth Weight among Women in Rural and Urban U.S. Counties with Higher Rates of Underweight Births.

    Health & social work·2026
    Same journal

    Fostering Racial Justice in Social Work Education.

    Health & social work·2026
    Same journal

    Mental Workload and Burnout among Social Work Professionals in Spain: The Protective Role of Psychological Capital and Perceived Social Support.

    Health & social work·2026
    Same journal

    Navigating Intimate Partner Violence and Social Support Services: Testimonials of Latina Survivors.

    Health & social work·2026
    See all related articles

    Social workers and clients largely agreed on intervention problems in a study of a problem-outcome classification system. However, social workers reported more negative intervention outcomes than clients did.

    Area of Science:

    • Social Work Research
    • Healthcare Quality Improvement
    • Client-Provider Communication

    Background:

    • Assessing the validity of problem-outcome classification systems is crucial for standardizing social work practice.
    • Understanding discrepancies in client and social worker perceptions of intervention outcomes is essential for effective care.
    • Acute-care teaching hospitals provide a complex environment for evaluating social work interventions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine the validity of a problem-outcome classification system in acute-care settings.
    • To compare social worker and client agreement on problem identification and intervention outcomes.
    • To identify potential biases in outcome assessment between social workers and clients.

    Main Methods:

    • A study involving six acute-care teaching hospitals.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of 343 randomly selected clients and 152 social workers.
  • Utilizing a problem-outcome classification system for assessment and comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • High agreement (77%) between social workers and clients on the nature of intervention problems.
    • Social workers tended to assign more negative values to intervention outcomes compared to clients.
    • Indicates a potential difference in perception of success or severity.

    Conclusions:

    • The problem-outcome classification system shows reasonable validity in problem identification.
    • Discrepancies in outcome assessment highlight the importance of incorporating client perspectives.
    • Further research is needed to explore the reasons behind differing outcome evaluations.