Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Overadjustment in case-control studies

N E Day, D P Byar, S B Green

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |November 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Overadjusting for variables in case-control studies, even those not truly confounding, can distort results. This practice increases variability and bias, potentially masking real associations between exposure and disease.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Monte Carlo Investigation of Methods for Controlling Type I Errors with Specification Searches in Structural Equation Modeling.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2016
    Same author

    How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2016
    Same author

    Control of Type I Errors with Multiple Tests of Constraints in Structural Equation Modeling.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2016
    Same author

    Linoleic acid, a dietary n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid, and the aetiology of ulcerative colitis: a nested case-control study within a European prospective cohort study.

    Gut·2009
    Same author

    Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation after whole bisulfitome amplification of a minute amount of DNA from body fluids.

    Epigenetics·2009
    Same author

    Prospective association between emotional health and clinical evidence of Parkinson's disease.

    European journal of neurology·2008
    Same journal

    Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to: Developing a novel algorithm to identify incident and prevalent dementia in Medicare claims-the ARIC Study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    RE: advancing observational research on arts and health: theory-informed approaches using the RADIANCE framework.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Maternal Cesarean Section and Offspring ASD or ADHD Risk: A Nurses' Health Study II Analysis.

    American journal of epidemiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Case-control studies are crucial for identifying associations between exposures and disease.
    • Confounding variables can distort the true relationship between exposure and disease.
    • Overadjustment, or adjusting for variables that are not true confounders, is a common issue in data analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of adjusting for non-confounding variables in case-control studies.
    • To quantify the effects of overadjustment on relative risk estimates.
    • To highlight the potential for overadjustment to reduce statistical significance and introduce bias.

    Main Methods:

    • Theoretical derivations were used to approximate the effects of overadjustment.
    • Simulations were conducted to validate the theoretical approximations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on the impact on relative risk estimates and statistical significance.

    • Main Results:

    • Adjusting for variables without a causal link to disease can increase the variability of relative risk estimates.
    • Selecting variables that maximally decrease relative risk leads to biased estimates.
    • Overadjustment can decrease statistical significance, leading to false negatives.

    Conclusions:

    • Overadjustment in case-control studies poses a significant risk to the validity of association findings.
    • Researchers should exercise caution when selecting variables for adjustment to avoid introducing bias.
    • The study underscores the importance of careful consideration of potential confounders to prevent erroneous conclusions.