Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
An improper use of statistical significance testing in studying covariables
Abstract:
How badly a covariable confounds the association between a disease and a primary trait depends on the strength of two other associations: between covariable and disease, and between covariable and primary trait. To assess the confounding potential by testing one of these associations for statistical significance, using a 'traditional' critical level, is inadequate. Such a preliminary test places the burden of proof in the wrong direction, ignores a major aspect of confounding potential, and may be inappropriately influenced by other factors. If it must be used at all, the significance level should be 0.25 or 0.50, possibly even higher.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Significance
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Significance Testing: Overview
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
