[Reaction time experiment on absolute or relative functional specialization of the cerebral hemispheres in man]

Lateralized presentations of verbal stimuli yield faster reaction times in the right visual field-left hemisphere, whereas nonverbal stimuli yield faster reaction times in the left visual field-right hemisphere. However, the problem of how lateral asymmetries in response latency are determined is still unsolved. The hypothesis of an absolute functional specialization of the two hemispheres suggests that information presented in the visual field connected with the unspecialized hemisphere has to travel along a less direct pathway, implying a crossing through the forebrain commissures, to reach the processing center. The hypothesis of a relative functional specialization assumes that stimuli are processed by the hemisphere contralateral to the field of presentation but speed of processing varies as a function of hemispheric specialization. The present study tried to find empirical evidence in favor of one of the two hypotheses. Choice reaction times to lateralized verbal stimuli were studied in normal subjects. In half of the trials the subjects had to carry out a concomitant task known to interfere selectively with mechanisms responsible of the organization of the responses of the left hemisphere. Both with and without concomitant task reaction times were significantly faster in the right visual field-left hemisphere. While the concomitant task produced an overall lengthening of reaction time, it did not affect interhemispheric asymmetry. This finding was discussed as evidence in favor of the absolute specialization hypothesis.