Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Performance evaluation of image-intensifier tubes

D Lee, A M Sourkes, A F Holloway

    Radiology
    |February 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The Role of Epigenetic Regulation in Transcriptional Memory in the Immune System.

    Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology·2017
    Same author

    Reversing aberrant methylation patterns in cancer.

    Current medicinal chemistry·2010
    Same author

    Determinants of a transcriptionally competent environment at the GM-CSF promoter.

    Nucleic acids research·2008
    Same author

    Targeting epigenetic modifiers in cancer.

    Current medicinal chemistry·2007
    Same author

    Regulation of cytokine gene transcription in the immune system.

    Molecular immunology·2002
    Same author

    Functional interaction between the HIV transactivator Tat and the transcriptional coactivator PC4 in T cells.

    The Journal of biological chemistry·2000
    Same journal

    Noncontrast Abbreviated MRI for Post-TACE Treatment Response Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Ancillary Features from LI-RADS.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Response Evaluation Criteria in Bone Metastases: Performance and Association of Response Classifications with Survival Outcomes.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Entropy for Prediction of MACEs in Myocarditis: A Cardiac MRI-based Biomarker of Myocardial Tissue Heterogeneity.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    AI for Radiology: A Primer Part II. Interacting with AI Results.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Hyperdense Capsule Sign at Noncontrast CT as an Indication for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A MAGIC-MT Trial Post Hoc Analysis.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Sawtooth Cardiomyopathy: The Tiger Heart.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Regular image quality testing of fluoroscopic equipment is crucial. Some systems degrade over time, necessitating semiannual checks to maintain diagnostic accuracy.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiology
    • Quality Assurance

    Background:

    • Fluoroscopic units utilizing image-intensifier tubes are vital in clinical diagnostics.
    • Consistent image quality is paramount for accurate medical diagnoses.
    • Variability in equipment performance over time can impact diagnostic efficacy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the stability of image quality in clinical fluoroscopic units over a two-year period.
    • To correlate objective image quality measurements with subjective radiologist assessments.
    • To establish recommendations for routine monitoring of fluoroscopic equipment.

    Main Methods:

    • Image quality measurements were performed over two years on eight clinical image-intensifier tube fluoroscopic units.
    • Objective measurements were compared against a radiologist's qualitative assessment of image quality.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Longitudinal data analysis was conducted to identify trends in image quality degradation.

    • Main Results:

    • Objective image quality measurements aligned with radiologist evaluations.
    • Some fluoroscopic systems maintained consistent image quality over two years.
    • Other systems exhibited significant deterioration, transitioning from acceptable to unacceptable image quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Image quality of fluoroscopic equipment can degrade over time, impacting diagnostic accuracy.
    • Semiannual image quality measurements are recommended for all diagnostic fluoroscopic equipment.
    • Proactive monitoring and maintenance are essential to ensure optimal diagnostic performance.