Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning to write: can books help?

R O Cummins

    Journal of Medical Education
    |February 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Recent books on scientific writing highlight clarity issues in manuscripts. Authors can improve their scientific communication skills by utilizing these practical guides.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Reading for Pleasure: A Yank reads in England.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same author

    Heart-to-heart talk. Roundtable discussion.

    JEMS : a journal of emergency medical services·2001
    Same author

    The most important changes in the international ECC and CPR guidelines 2000.

    Resuscitation·2000
    Same author

    Guidelines based on fear of type II (false-negative) errors. Why we dropped the pulse check for lay rescuers.

    Resuscitation·2000
    Same author

    Guidelines based on the principle 'First, do no harm'. New guidelines on tracheal tube confirmation and prevention of dislodgment.

    Resuscitation·2000
    Same author

    The most important changes in the international ECC and CPR guidelines 2000.

    Circulation·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Writing
    • Scientific Communication

    Background:

    • A surge in publications on scientific writing underscores concerns about manuscript quality.
    • Authors frequently produce unclear, verbose, and confusing scientific papers.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review recent books on scientific writing.
    • To advocate for improved clarity in scientific manuscripts.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of at least seven recent books on scientific writing.
    • Analysis of common criticisms regarding scientific manuscript quality.

    Main Results:

    • Recent literature offers practical guidance for improving scientific writing.
    • Many academic authors neglect fundamental writing improvement techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • Medical authors can enhance clarity in their writing by consulting available resources.
    • Addressing poor writing quality is crucial for effective scientific communication.