Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Microfluidic Flow Chambers Using Reconstituted Blood to Model Hemostasis and Platelet Transfusion In Vitro
Published on: March 19, 2016
A critical review of platelet yield by Haemonetics 30 . Based on literature and own observations
By means of a haemonetics 30 cell separator platelets were collected for transfusion purposes from 18 different blood donors. A median yield of 5.7 X 10(11) platelets was obtained. The yield of platelets was found to be linearly related to the donors' initial platelet counts. The procedures were standardized by using one size of bowl (225 ml), performing 10 cycles per procedure, and performing all cycles as uniformly as possible. The median time per procedure was 118 min. Mild donor reactions were seen in 8 donors (44%) consisting of circumoral tingling. The decrement in the donors' platelet count was 86 X 10(9)/1, 37% of the initial platelet counts. The choice of the bowl size of 225 ml is motivated. The absurdity of the expression of yield pe h of processing, and of yield per 1 of blood processed is discussed. Furthermore, it is shown, that neither the fall in haematocrit nor the fall in the platelet count during the procedure are linear. The formulas commonly used for calculating the blood volume and platelet extraction efficiency, which are based on these assumptions, cannot therefore, in our opinion, be used.
By means of a haemonetics 30 cell separator platelets were collected for transfusion purposes from 18 different blood donors. A median yield of 5.7 X 10(11) platelets was obtained. The yield of platelets was found to be linearly related to the donors' initial platelet counts. The procedures were standardized by using one size of bowl (225 ml), performing 10 cycles per procedure, and performing all cycles as uniformly as possible. The median time per procedure was 118 min. Mild donor reactions were seen in 8 donors (44%) consisting of circumoral tingling. The decrement in the donors' platelet count was 86 X 10(9)/1, 37% of the initial platelet counts. The choice of the bowl size of 225 ml is motivated. The absurdity of the expression of yield pe h of processing, and of yield per 1 of blood processed is discussed. Furthermore, it is shown, that neither the fall in haematocrit nor the fall in the platelet count during the procedure are linear. The formulas commonly used for calculating the blood volume and platelet extraction efficiency, which are based on these assumptions, cannot therefore, in our opinion, be used.

