Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Why do research ethics committees disagree with each other?

¹Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College, London.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London

|July 1, 1995

Summary

Research ethics committees (RECs) balance competing moral claims to protect participants from harm and ensure research integrity. Disagreements among RECs highlight the complexity of ethical review processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Establishing an International Psychoanalytic Nurses Alliance [IPNA].

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2026

Same author

Late diagnosis of paediatric HIV infection in high-income countries: Lessons from the HIV Perinatal Virtual Clinic.

HIV medicine·2025

Same author

Co-designing a web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue in people living with a brain tumour.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2025

Same author

Understanding healthcare workers' experiences of face mask use in healthcare settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interview study.

Infection prevention in practice·2025

Same author

"Such a different type of tiredness": people with brain tumour, their caregivers', and healthcare professionals' qualitative perceptions of cancer-related fatigue.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2024

Same author

Healthcare professionals' knowledge, understanding and confidence to manage chronic pain after cancer treatment: A UK survey.

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society·2024

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Research Integrity

Background:

Research ethics committees (RECs) are crucial for safeguarding participants.
RECs must ensure research questions are valid and answerable.
Participant safety and autonomy are primary ethical considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the ethical considerations and decision-making processes of research ethics committees.
To explore the challenges faced by RECs when balancing competing moral claims.

Main Methods:

Review of ethical guidelines and principles for research involving human subjects.
Analysis of scenarios where ethical conflicts arise, such as non-therapeutic research or vulnerable populations.
Examination of the concept of 'balancing act' in ethical decision-making.

Keywords:

Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

RECs must weigh potential benefits against risks to participants.
Ethical dilemmas intensify with non-therapeutic research or when consent capacity is compromised.
Discrepancies in ethical judgments among different committees are common due to the sensitive nature of moral balancing.

Conclusions:

The ethical review process requires a nuanced approach to competing moral claims.
Standardized ethical decision-making remains challenging due to context-specific factors.
Further discourse on REC decision-making is needed to ensure consistent ethical oversight.