Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Naive theories and causal deduction

D D Cummins1

  • 1University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA.

Memory & Cognition
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Two factors, alternative causes and disabling conditions, significantly influence deductive reasoning about causality. Familiarity with causal relationships also affects how readily people accept deductive conclusions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Fairley and Manktelow's comment on "Naive theories and causal deduction".

Memory & cognition·2016
Same author

Evidence of deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year-old children.

Memory & cognition·1996
Same author

Conditional reasoning and causation.

Memory & cognition·1991
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Causal Inference
  • Reasoning Science

Background:

  • Deductive reasoning is crucial for understanding cause-and-effect relationships.
  • Existing models often focus on logical structure, potentially overlooking real-world causal complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of alternative causes and disabling conditions on deductive causal reasoning.
  • To determine how causal necessity and sufficiency judgments mediate these effects.
  • To examine the influence of logical form and familiarity on causal deductive judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in deductive reasoning tasks involving causal scenarios.
  • Experimental manipulations focused on varying the presence of alternative causes and disabling conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Familiarity with causal relationships was assessed and controlled for.

    • Main Results:

    • Alternative causes and disabling conditions exerted a stronger influence on causal deductive judgments than logical form.
    • Judgments of causal necessity and sufficiency were significantly affected by these causal factors.
    • Increased familiarity with a causal relationship led to reduced acceptance of deductive conclusions.

    Conclusions:

    • Causal reasoning is significantly shaped by the presence of alternative causes and disabling conditions.
    • Reasoners' judgments of necessity and sufficiency are key mediators in deductive causal inference.
    • Familiarity plays a critical role, influencing the confidence and acceptance of causal deductions.