Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Endobronchial biopsy and cytology. Comparative study]

R Matos1, M R Silva, L Carvalho

  • 1Serviço de Anatomia Patológica, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra.

Acta Medica Portuguesa
|July 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Histological biopsy and bronchial brushing offer higher diagnostic accuracy for lung cancer detection than bronchial washing. Brushing proved more effective than washing in cytological examinations for identifying malignant lung lesions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biflavonoids and glucopyranoside derivatives from <i>Ouratea polygyna</i> (Ochnaceae) and their inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 3CL<sup>Pro</sup> main protease.

Natural product research·2025
Same author

A taxogenomic view of the genus <i>Torulaspora</i>: an expansion from ten to twenty-two species.

Persoonia·2025
Same author

Advanced equine duodenoscopy technique.

Journal of equine veterinary science·2025
Same author

Understanding the hydrological and landscape connectivity of lakes.

Landscape ecology·2025
Same author

<i>Theileria orientalis</i> Ikeda infection detected in red deer but not dogs or horses in New Zealand.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2024
Same author

Real-world EGFR testing practices for non-small-cell lung cancer by thoracic pathology laboratories across Europe.

ESMO open·2023

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Oncology
  • Diagnostic Pathology

Background:

  • Accurate diagnosis of lung cancer is crucial for effective treatment.
  • Fiber optic bronchoscopy is a common procedure for investigating suspected lung lesions.
  • Evaluating the diagnostic yield of different sampling methods is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy of histological biopsy versus cytological examination (brushing and washing) in fiber optic bronchoscopy for lung cancer.
  • To assess the effectiveness of bronchial brushing and washing in patients with and without pathological confirmation of malignancy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 530 patients with suspected lung cancer undergoing fiber optic bronchoscopy.
  • Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between histological biopsy, bronchial brushing, and bronchial washing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of patients into those with (Group A) and without (Group B) pathological confirmation of malignancy.

    • Main Results:

    • Histological biopsy showed a diagnostic accuracy of 78.7% in Group A.
    • Cytological examination had an overall accuracy of 58% in Group A.
    • Bronchial brushing yielded higher accuracy (94.1% in Group A, 91.8% in Group B) compared to bronchial washing (38.6% in Group A, 48% in Group B).

    Conclusions:

    • Bronchial brushing demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy compared to bronchial washing for lung cancer detection via fiber optic bronchoscopy.
    • While brushing is more effective than washing, histological biopsy remains the most accurate diagnostic method.