Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nutrient Databank perspectives on energy

R H Matthews1

  • 1Nutrient Data Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture, Riverdale, MD 20737, USA.

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outpatient myeloablative allo-SCT: a comprehensive approach yields decreased hospital utilization and low TRM.

Bone marrow transplantation·2009
Same author

Home administration of high-dose oral busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Bone marrow transplantation·2007
Same author

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer.

The oncologist·2000
Same author

Effects of 4-hydroxynonenal and N-acetyl-L-cysteine on Myc-induced apoptosis.

Toxicology letters·1996
Same author

High-performance liquid chromatography assay for N-acetylcysteine in biological samples following derivatization with N-(1-pyrenyl)maleimide.

Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical applications·1996
Same author

N-actylcysteine protects Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells from lead-induced oxidative stress.

Toxicology·1996
Same journal

Nourishing Collaboration: Interdisciplinary Nutrition Education for Health Care Professionals.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Associations of red blood cell fatty acids with personality traits: 10-year follow-up in the Kibbutzim Family Study.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to: Vitamin D status and breast cancer in Saudi Arabian women: case-control study [Am J Clin Nutr 98 (2013) 105-110].

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

High postprandial endotoxemia is associated with recurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease: from the CORDIOPREV randomized clinical trial.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Reply to Wu et al.: "Nitrate and nitrite food composition database: an update and extensive deep dive".

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Reframing Basic Experimental Studies in Humans-Implications for Nutrition Science.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
See all related articles

The Atwater system accurately calculates food energy, but recent food technology advances and analytical changes raise concerns for nutrient databank energy reporting. Further discussion on these issues is needed.

Area of Science:

  • Nutritional Science
  • Food Science
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • The Atwater system is the standard for calculating food energy in nutrient databases.
  • The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) commissioned a review of the Atwater system in 1983.
  • A 1983 Life Sciences Research Office (LSRO) report found no significant issues with the Atwater system's accuracy or utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reassess the accuracy and utility of the Atwater system for food energy calculation.
  • To address concerns regarding energy reporting in nutrient databanks due to modern food technologies and analytical methods.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing scientific literature and expert panel consensus.
  • Analysis of the impact of advancements in food technology on energy calculations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of changes in analytical methodologies and their effect on nutrient data.
  • Main Results:

    • The 1983 LSRO expert panel found no substantial evidence of problems with the Atwater system.
    • Recent advances in food technology and analytical methods have introduced new concerns for energy reporting.
    • The utility of the Atwater system may be affected by these contemporary changes.

    Conclusions:

    • While historically validated, the Atwater system requires ongoing evaluation in light of evolving food science.
    • Concerns exist regarding the accurate reporting of energy values in nutrient databanks.
    • Further discussion and potential adjustments are warranted to ensure the continued relevance and accuracy of food energy calculations.