Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values

J S Prawat1, L Nieberg, G J Cisneros

  • 1Division of Orthodontics, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, N.Y. 10467, USA.

The Angle Orthodontist
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Erythropoietin receptor contributes to melanoma cell survival in vivo.

Oncogene·2011
Same author

Lymphatic vessel density is significantly increased in melanoma.

Journal of cutaneous pathology·2004
Same author

Systemic and regional hemorheological consequences of warm and cold hind limb ischemia-reperfusion in a canine model.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2004
Same author

The influence of medical history on restorative procedure failure rates following dental rehabilitation.

Pediatric dentistry·2002
Same author

Perceived outcomes and parental satisfaction following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia.

Pediatric dentistry·2001
Same author

A 20-year perspective on the changing use of hand over mouth (HOM) and restraint in postdoctoral pediatric dental education.

Pediatric dentistry·2001
Same journal

Impact of cone-beam computed tomography image quality on artificial intelligence-driven three-dimensional tooth segmentation and evaluation of external apical root resorption.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Bracket transfer accuracy of two three-dimensionally printed lingual indirect bonding trays with different bracket frame designs.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical impact of beveling design on extrusion of a maxillary canine and a maxillary first molar: an in vitro and finite element analysis study.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of resin-modified glass ionomer vs composite bonding agents for orthodontic bonding: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Plastic deformation evaluation of clear aligners exposed to different cleaning solutions.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same journal

Quantitative evaluation of an artificial intelligence-driven remote monitoring system for occlusion assessment using patient-captured images.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
See all related articles

Sonic imaging systems offer a less invasive alternative to cephalometric radiography for diagnosing malocclusion. However, this study found sonically generated data to be variable and less reproducible than traditional radiographic methods.

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Orthodontics
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Cephalometric radiography is essential for diagnosing malocclusion and skeletal disharmony.
  • Concerns about radiation exposure, especially in growing patients, limit its use in longitudinal studies.
  • Less invasive diagnostic methods are needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the validity and reproducibility of sonically generated cephalometric measurements with standard radiographic methods.
  • To evaluate the Digigraph system as an alternative to cephalometric radiography.

Main Methods:

  • Compared 43 cephalometric measurements from a sonic imaging system (Digigraph) to those from standard radiographs.
  • Assessed correlation and reproducibility of data from both methods.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • 58.1% of sonic measurements showed significant correlation with radiographic measurements.
  • No consistent trends in correlation were observed for dental or skeletal structures.
  • Sonic imaging data exhibited marked variability, while radiographic data were reproducible.

Conclusions:

  • The Digigraph system shows limited validity and reproducibility compared to standard cephalometric radiography.
  • Further research is needed to improve sonic imaging technology for orthodontic diagnostics.