Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Technologic considerations for breast tumor size assessment

P L Davis1, K S McCarty

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, USA.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Folic acid and the bone marrow in radiation therapy.

The American journal of medicine·2010
Same author

Localization and in vitro specificity of histone acetylation.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2009
Same author

Radioisotopic localization of (90)Yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan in patients with CD20+ non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Molecular imaging and biology·2008
Same author

The evolutionary dynamics of canid and mongoose rabies virus in Southern Africa.

Archives of virology·2007
Same author

Assessing the potential versus the actual earnings of academic radiologists: effects of unequal duty service assignments.

Academic radiology·2001
Same author

Evidence-based practice and the home care nurse's bag.

Home healthcare nurse·1999

Accurately measuring breast cancer size is crucial for staging and treatment. This review compares palpation, mammography, ultrasonography, and MR imaging, highlighting MR imaging

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Tumor size is a critical factor in breast cancer staging and determining treatment effectiveness.
  • Accurate breast tumor measurement is essential for patient management and prognosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare the current techniques used for measuring breast tumor size.
  • To evaluate the applications and limitations of palpation, mammography, ultrasonography, and MR imaging.
  • To highlight the potential improvements and advantages offered by MR imaging in breast cancer measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on breast tumor measurement techniques.
  • Comparative analysis of palpation, mammography, ultrasonography, and MR imaging.
  • Discussion of the technical aspects and clinical utility of each modality.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Palpation offers a basic assessment but lacks precision.
  • Mammography and ultrasonography provide imaging-based measurements with varying degrees of accuracy and limitations.
  • MR imaging demonstrates potential for superior accuracy and detailed visualization of tumor size.

Conclusions:

  • Each breast tumor measurement technique has distinct applications and limitations.
  • MR imaging shows promise for enhancing the accuracy of breast tumor size assessment.
  • Further research and integration of advanced imaging techniques like MR imaging are important for optimizing breast cancer care.