Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines

A S Basinski1

  • 1Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, North York.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oral prostaglandin (PGE2) therapy for chronic viral hepatitis B and C.

Journal of viral hepatitis·1999
Same author

Fairness in the coronary angiography queue.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·1999
Same author

A survey of provider experiences and perceptions of preferential access to cardiovascular care in Ontario, Canada.

Annals of internal medicine·1998
Same author

The need for acute, subacute and nonacute care at 105 general hospital sites in Ontario. Joint Policy and Planning Committee Non-Acute Hospitalization Project Working Group.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·1998
Same author

Medical abortion: what does the research tell us?

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·1996
Same author

Rating the urgency of coronary angiography: results of an expert panel process. Ontario Coronary Angiography Panel.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·1993

Evaluating clinical practice guidelines is crucial for their success but receives little attention. This study outlines three essential evaluation types and planning strategies for effective guideline implementation and improvement.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Informatics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are essential for standardizing care.
  • Current efforts heavily favor CPG development over rigorous evaluation.
  • The success of CPGs hinges on systematic and routine evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the inadequacy of current guideline evaluation efforts.
  • To define and categorize the types of guideline evaluation.
  • To provide a framework for planning effective guideline evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of guideline evaluation.
  • Identification and categorization of distinct evaluation types.
  • Discussion of key components for evaluation planning.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Three primary types of guideline evaluation were identified: pre-dissemination, program-level, and scientific evaluation.
  • Evaluation of guidelines during development and before implementation is critical.
  • Scientific evaluation provides the knowledge base for guideline evolution.

Conclusions:

  • Routine evaluation is paramount for the ultimate success of clinical practice guidelines.
  • A structured approach to evaluation planning, including goal setting and design, is necessary.
  • Increased focus on evaluation is needed to enhance the impact and evolution of guidelines.