Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The trauma-memory argument

J F Kihlstrom1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

Consciousness and Cognition
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The trauma-memory argument suggests forgotten childhood trauma memories impact adult behavior. However, current evidence relies on flawed studies, necessitating more research for clinical application.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Priming and recognition in ECT-induced amnesia.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Awareness and information processing in general anesthesia.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2012
Same author

On bridging the gap between social-personality psychology and neuropsychology.

Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc·2005
Same author

Somatization as illness behavior.

Advances in mind-body medicine·2002
Same author

False memories in women with self-reported childhood sexual abuse: an empirical study.

Psychological science·2001
Same author

In memoriam: Martin T. Orne, 1927-2000.

The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis·2000
Same journal

When one part feels, the whole belongs: associations between local touch referral and illusory full-limb ownership in individuals with leg amputation.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory control and mind wandering; more difficult inhibition decreases mind wandering, within limits.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Autism and Aphantasia.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Absolute pitch and sound-color synesthesia provide for unique learning opportunities.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Could we perceive the world differently than we do? Neuroscience-based emergentism and the biological function of consciousness.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Motivational intensity in positive emotion and observation-based false memory: the role of action simulation.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Studies

Background:

  • The trauma-memory argument posits that unconscious childhood trauma memories can surface in adulthood, influencing behavior.
  • This argument is often supported by anecdotal case reports and clinical studies.
  • Concerns exist regarding the methodological rigor and representativeness of existing evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the scientific basis of the trauma-memory argument.
  • To assess the validity of claims regarding repressed memories of childhood trauma.
  • To determine the readiness of the trauma-memory argument for informing clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on trauma memory, repression, and retrieval.
  • Analysis of methodological limitations in clinical studies supporting the trauma-memory argument.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the plausibility of trauma memory based on known memory processes.

    • Main Results:

    • Conclusions supporting the trauma-memory argument are based on case reports of questionable representativeness.
    • Clinical studies often exhibit methodological flaws and fail to consider alternative explanations.
    • Independent verification of purportedly recovered memories is frequently lacking.

    Conclusions:

    • While the trauma-memory argument has some plausible aspects concerning memory function, current evidence is insufficient.
    • Significant methodological limitations and a lack of independent verification undermine the argument's scientific foundation.
    • Further rigorous research is essential before the trauma-memory argument can reliably guide clinical practice.