Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Setting priorities and selecting topics for clinical practice guidelines

R N Battista1, M J Hodge

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal QC.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Setting priorities for clinical guidelines involves considering population health burden and economic factors. A proposed framework emphasizes public input and data integration for effective health policy development.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetics in health care: an overview of current and emerging models.

Public health genomics·2011
Same author

Changing concepts of primary open-angle glaucoma and early detection.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

The periodic health examination in the workplace: Identifying and modifying occupational risks.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

Physicians' attitudes to the pharmacological treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2004
Same author

A cautionary tale: rethinking medicare.

HealthcarePapers·2003
Same author

Are patients suffering from stable angina receiving optimal medical treatment?

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2001

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Priority setting and topic selection are crucial yet under-addressed aspects of clinical guidelines development.
  • Stakeholder perspectives are vital for establishing effective guidelines.
  • Existing frameworks for priority setting in guidelines development require refinement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore factors influencing priority setting in guidelines development.
  • To propose a framework for effective priority setting in clinical guidelines.
  • To integrate stakeholder input and evidence into the guidelines development process.

Main Methods:

  • A survey of guidelines stakeholders in Canada was conducted.
  • Literature review on priority setting in guidelines development was performed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of survey responses to identify key priority-setting factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Population health burden is a significant factor in priority setting.
    • Economic considerations (treatment costs, societal burden) are weighted differently by stakeholders.
    • Stakeholder groups vary in their prioritization criteria.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive framework for priority setting in guidelines development is proposed.
    • Public and community participation should be integrated.
    • Quantitative data on practice variation and links to health policy are essential for effective guidelines.