Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forehead flap in nasal reconstruction

M Friduss1, P Dagum, A Mandych

  • 1Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, South San Francisco, CA 94080-3299, USA.

Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery : Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three-dimensional geometric comparison of partial and complete flexible mitral annuloplasty rings.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2001
Same author

Pathogenesis of mitral regurgitation in tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy.

Circulation·2001
Same author

Influence of anterior mitral leaflet second-order chordae on leaflet dynamics and valve competence.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2001
Same author

The role of atrial contraction in mitral valve closure.

The Journal of heart valve disease·2001
Same author

Edge-to-edge mitral repair: gradients and three-dimensional annular dynamics in vivo during inotropic stimulation.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2001
Same author

Coordinate-free analysis of mitral valve dynamics in normal and ischemic hearts.

Circulation·2000

Forehead flap reconstruction is optimal for large nasal defects. Paramedian forehead flaps offer superior results compared to midline flaps, especially for nasal tip reconstruction, aided by computer simulation.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery
  • Medical Simulation

Background:

  • Nasal defects often result from Mohs surgery for tumor ablation.
  • Forehead flap reconstruction is a common method for nasal defect repair.
  • Preoperative planning can optimize reconstructive surgery outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish criteria for anesthetic forehead flap reconstructions.
  • To evaluate the impact of computer simulation on planning forehead flap nasal reconstructions.
  • To compare midline and paramedian forehead flaps for nasal reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • A case series of 13 patients undergoing nasal reconstruction.
  • Utilized patient satisfaction and physician evaluations for outcome measures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed mathematical models and computer simulation for flap design and transposition analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • No major complications occurred; minor complications included transient pincushioning and scar contracture.
    • Paramedian forehead flaps demonstrated superiority over midline flaps, particularly for distal nasal tip defects.
    • Computer simulation accurately correlated 2D flap design with the 3D transposition process.

    Conclusions:

    • Forehead flap reconstruction is the preferred method for extensive nasal defects.
    • Paramedian forehead flaps are advantageous for nasal reconstruction, especially for tip defects.
    • Computer simulation enhances understanding of flap geometry, optimizing reconstructive surgical planning.