Related Experiment Videos
The structure of psychological distress
M Préville1, L Potvin, R Boyer
1Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Psychological Reports
|August 1, 1995
Summary
This study compared two versions of the Psychological Distress Index. The 29-item version, including psychophysiological symptoms, showed stronger associations with health status, suggesting potential bias from somatic items.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Psychometrics
- Public health surveys
Background:
- The Psychological Distress Index (PDI) is used in the Quebec Health Survey.
- Assessing psychological distress is crucial for understanding population health.
- The PDI's factor structure and symptom inclusion require validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the factor structure of a 29-item PDI (including psychophysiological symptoms) with an 18-item version (cognitive and affective symptoms only).
- To evaluate the construct validity and associations with demographic and health indicators for both PDI versions.
Main Methods:
- Confirmatory factor analyses (LISREL VII) were performed on three samples (N=2,000).
- Logistic regression was used to assess associations with demographic variables and health indicators.
- The study focused on the factor structure of the Psychological Distress Index.
Main Results:
- Both the 18-item and 29-item versions of the PDI demonstrated satisfactory construct validity.
- Demographic associations were similar for both versions, except for age.
- The 29-item PDI showed a stronger association with health status indexes, indicating potential bias from somatic items.
Conclusions:
- The 29-item PDI, encompassing psychophysiological symptoms, offers a broader assessment but may introduce bias.
- The choice of PDI version depends on the research question and desired scope of distress measurement.
- Further research is needed to refine PDI's utility in diverse populations and health contexts.