Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Arsenic risk assessment

H Carlson-Lynch¹, B D Beck, P D Boardman

¹ChemRisk Division, McLaren/Hart Environmental Engineering Corporation, Portland, ME 04102.

Environmental Health Perspectives

|April 1, 1994

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Music therapy was noninferior to verbal standard treatment of traumatized refugees in mental health care: Results from a randomized clinical trial.

European journal of psychotraumatology·2021

Same author

Chk1 phosphorylation of Metnase enhances DNA repair but inhibits replication fork restart.

Oncogene·2012

Same author

The use of information on susceptibility in risk assessment: state of the science and potential for improvement.

Environmental toxicology and pharmacology·2011

Same author

Historical perspective on the use of animal bioassays to predict carcinogenicity: evolution in design and recognition of utility.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2011

Same author

An evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency definition of a risk assessment.

Human & experimental toxicology·2006

Same author

Risk evaluation of occupational exposure to methylene dianiline and toluene diamine in polyurethane foam.

Human & experimental toxicology·2006

Same journal

A New Start.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

Same journal

Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

Environmental health perspectives·2026

See all related articles

This review examines arsenic methylation and its role in cancer risk. Current assessments may underestimate risks due to insufficient consideration of detoxification and population differences.

Area of Science:

Environmental Health
Toxicology
Epidemiology

Background:

Arsenic risk assessment involves understanding methylation and cancer links.
Previous studies by Hopenhayn-Rich et al. and Smith et al. addressed these issues.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically review recent publications on arsenic methylation and internal cancer risk.
To identify limitations in current arsenic risk assessment methodologies.

Main Methods:

Review of existing epidemiological and regression analyses.
Evaluation of data on urinary arsenic levels and dose-response relationships.
Critique of exposure estimation and population-specific risk factors.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

Hopenhayn-Rich et al. found no correlation between inorganic arsenic and urinary concentration, but this doesn't rule out methylation thresholds.

Smith et al. suggested arsenic is a risk factor for skin and internal cancers (lung, liver, bladder, kidney).

Deficiencies in Smith et al.'s analysis include underestimated exposure, lack of detoxification consideration, and ignored population differences.

Conclusions:

Current arsenic risk assessments may be limited by a lack of understanding of methylation thresholds.
Further research is needed to account for non-water sources, detoxification, and population-specific factors for accurate risk assessment.
Arsenic's role as a risk factor for internal cancers requires more thorough investigation.