Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Is "nonpropositional" speech preserved in aphasia?

C C Lum¹, A W Ellis

¹Department of Psychology, University of York, England.

Brain and Language

|April 1, 1994

Summary

Aphasia patients showed varied performance on propositional and nonpropositional speech tasks. While not universally preserved, the distinction between these speech types offers insights into aphasia, potentially linked to semantic versus phonological processing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Facial expressions and Parkinson's disease.

Behavioural neurology·2014

Same author

Delusional misidentification incident in a right hemisphere stroke patient.

Behavioural neurology·2014

Same author

Processing of words and faces by patients with left and right temporal lobe epilepsy.

Behavioural neurology·2014

Same author

A versatile ultra high vacuum sample stage with six degrees of freedom.

The Review of scientific instruments·2013

Same author

A simple energy filter for low energy electron microscopy/photoelectron emission microscopy instruments.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2011

Same author

In situ observations of endotaxial growth of CoSi2 nanowires on Si(110) using ultrahigh vacuum transmission electron microscopy.

Nanotechnology·2011

Area of Science:

Neurolinguistics
Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

Aphasia, a language disorder resulting from brain damage, often affects speech production and comprehension.
The distinction between propositional (complex, voluntary) and nonpropositional (automatic, formulaic) speech is crucial for understanding language deficits.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the differentiation between propositional and nonpropositional speech in individuals with aphasia.
To determine if nonpropositional speech is generally preserved in aphasia.
To explore the underlying cognitive processes (semantic vs. phonological) associated with each speech type.

Main Methods:

Twenty-eight aphasic patients completed six tasks assessing nonpropositional speech and six matched tasks assessing propositional speech.
Behavioral data from task performance were analyzed.
Principal components analysis was used to identify underlying factors differentiating task types.
Error analysis was conducted to infer processing demands.

Main Results:

The Numbers and Picture Naming tasks showed the most reliable differentiation between nonpropositional and propositional speech behaviors.
A smaller effect was noted for Days of the Week and Phrase Repetition tasks.
Only a minority of patients (6/28) consistently demonstrated a nonpropositional speech advantage.
Principal components analysis identified two factors distinguishing the speech task types.

Conclusions:

Nonpropositional speech is not consistently preserved in the aphasia population as a whole, though some individuals may exhibit an advantage.
The distinction between propositional and nonpropositional speech remains relevant for aphasia research and clinical application.
Propositional tasks appear to rely more on semantic processing, while nonpropositional tasks may engage phonological processing more heavily.

Related Experiment Videos