Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lead systems for atrial defibrillation

C Alferness1, G M Ayers, R A Cooper

  • 1InControl, Inc., Redmond, WA 98052-6734.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|May 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Barriers and facilitators to students with physical disabilities' participation in academic laboratory spaces.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2019
Same author

Participation in science and engineering laboratories for students with physical disabilities: survey development and psychometrics.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2018
Same author

The Influence of Glove Type on Simulated Wheelchair Racing Propulsion: A Pilot Study.

International journal of sports medicine·2015
Same author

Clinical impact of FDG PET-CT on the management of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Clinical radiology·2014
Same author

Biofilms in wounds: a review of present knowledge.

Journal of wound care·2014
Same author

Arthrography.

Orthopedics·2014

Optimizing electrode placement for atrial defibrillation is key. Electrode systems including both atria, particularly the right atrial appendage to left atrial appendage vector, show the lowest energy thresholds, improving defibrillation efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Medical Device Engineering

Background:

  • Atrial defibrillation requires effective electrode placement for optimal energy delivery.
  • Current transvenous systems face challenges in achieving consistent low defibrillation thresholds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate various electrode configurations for atrial defibrillation.
  • To identify electrode locations yielding the lowest defibrillation energy thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of five studies comparing different electrode placements.
  • Assessment of defibrillation thresholds across various right and left atrial vectors.
  • Comparison of single vs. dual catheter systems.

Main Results:

  • Electrode locations spanning both left and right atria demonstrated lower thresholds.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The right atrial appendage to left atrial appendage vector showed the lowest thresholds.
  • Transvenous systems confining the electric field were more effective than right atrium to chest wall patches.
  • Proximal coronary sinus vectors exhibited high thresholds, while distal great cardiac vein placement is recommended.

    • Conclusions:

    • Optimal atrial defibrillation electrode placement involves utilizing vectors that span both atria.
    • The right atrial appendage to left atrial appendage vector is highly effective.
    • Future catheter designs should aim for distal great cardiac vein implantation for improved left atrial coverage.