Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Surgical Techniques for Catheter Placement and 5/6 Nephrectomy in Murine Models of Peritoneal Dialysis
Published on: July 19, 2018
Pyeloplasty in infants and children with particular reference to the method of drainage post-operatively
Insights
Extra-anastomotic sump drainage is preferred for pediatric pyeloplasty in children over two years old. In younger infants, pyelostomy drainage combined with a trans-anastomotic splint may yield better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Urology
Background:
- Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty is a common surgical procedure for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
- The choice of post-operative drainage method can impact patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the influence of different drainage methods on the post-operative course and radiological results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty.
- To determine the optimal drainage strategy based on patient age.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 63 consecutive Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasties.
- Comparison of outcomes between extra-anastomotic sump drainage (40 cases) and pyelostomy drainage (23 cases).
Main Results:
- Fewer post-operative complications were observed with extra-anastomotic sump drainage.
- Radiological outcomes were not significantly affected by drainage method, except in patients under 2 years.
- Infants under 2 years with pyelostomy drainage showed better radiological results.
Conclusions:
- Extra-anastomotic sump drainage is recommended for pyeloplasty in children over 2 years of age.
- For infants under 2 years, pyelostomy drainage combined with a trans-anastomotic splint is suggested for optimal results.
Abstract:
Sixty-three consecutive Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasties in infants and children have been reviewed with particular reference to any influence the method of drainage might have on the post-operative course and the final radiological result. Extra-anastomotic drainage usually with a sump drain, was used in 40 cases and pyelostomy drainage in 23 cases. Fewer post-operative complications were encountered in the former group. The final radiological result was not influenced by the method of drainage except that, in patients under 2 years of age, those with pyelostomy drainage fared rather better. It is concluded that (a) extra-anastomotic sump drainage is the method of choice following pyeloplasty in children over 2 years of age, and (b) in infants under 2 years of age pyelostomy drainage probably should be combined with a trans-anastomotic splint.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography

