[Long-term results of transurethral prostate incision (TUIP) and transurethral prostate resection (TURP). A...

TUIP (transurethral incision of the prostate) or TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) was performed in 120 patients to treat small-volume (< 20 g) benign prostatic hyperplasia in a prospective randomized study. The mean follow up was 43 months. Preoperatively and at regular follow-up visits obstructive and irritative symptom scores were obtained, sexual function was evaluated, and a uroflow study was performed. Both treatments achieved a marked improvement of symptoms. The obstructive, irritative and the total symptom scores did not differ significantly between TURP and TUIP. After 2-3 years the scores slowly increased in both groups. Subjective satisfaction rates averaged about 60% after more than 3 years and remained at this level. Initial significant differences in the peak flow rate in favour of TURP were no longer seen after more than 2 years. In smaller prostates TURP and TUIP are equally effective and since TUIP has fewer side effects and entails lower costs it appears to be an acceptable alternative to TURP.