Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Studying the Cytoskeleton01:17

Studying the Cytoskeleton

The cytoskeletal architecture can be studied using different microscopic and biochemical techniques. Electron microscopy was instrumental in discovering the cytoskeletal architecture around the 1960s, which allowed obtaining structural information at a high-resolution level. However, the sample preparation procedure often limits this ability in biological samples. Several protocols have been developed over the years to optimize sample preparation. In one of the protocols known as rotary...
Atomic Force Microscopy01:08

Atomic Force Microscopy

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a type of scanning probe microscopy that can analyze topographic details of various specimens like ceramics, glass, polymers, and biological samples. AFM offers over 1000 times more resolution than the optical imaging system. Images generated from AFM are three-dimensional surface profiles, offering an advantage over the flat, two-dimensional images from other imaging techniques.
The AFM Probe
The probe is regarded as the heart of any AFM setup and comprises the...
Overview of Microscopy Techniques01:22

Overview of Microscopy Techniques

The early pioneers of microscopy opened a window into the invisible world of microorganisms. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes that leveraged nonvisible light, such as fluorescence microscopy that uses an ultraviolet light source and electron microscopy that uses short-wavelength electron beams. These advances significantly improved magnification, image resolution, and contrast. By comparison, the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diverse excess GABA modes drive autism and epilepsy-autism comorbidity.

Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)·2026
Same author

Ephaptic conduction molding memory engrams.

BMC biology·2025
Same author

Possible mechanism of schizophrenia origin by excess GABA and synaptic pruning.

IBRO neuroscience reports·2023
Same author

A possible new cardiac heterogeneity as an arrhythmogenic driver.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Percolation and tortuosity in heart-like cells.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Origin of post-ictal and post-anesthesia adverse effects and possibly of SUDEP.

Medical hypotheses·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Live Cell Response to Mechanical Stimulation Studied by Integrated Optical and Atomic Force Microscopy
09:20

Live Cell Response to Mechanical Stimulation Studied by Integrated Optical and Atomic Force Microscopy

Published on: October 5, 2010

Large secretory structures at the cell surface imaged with scanning force microscopy

A Spudich1, D Braunstein

  • 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|July 18, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study used scanning force microscopy to observe changes on the surface of RBL cells during secretion. When cells were activated, surface pits of about 1.5 microns appeared and changed over time. These structures correlated with granules positioned along cytoskeletal filaments. The study suggests these pits may be involved in membrane retrieval after stimulation. The findings provide insight into how cells manage surface-level changes during secretion.

Keywords:
cell surface imagingsecretion mechanismsRBL cell activationscanning force microscopy

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Imaging of Extracellular Vesicles by Atomic Force Microscopy
10:11

Imaging of Extracellular Vesicles by Atomic Force Microscopy

Published on: September 11, 2019

Functionalization of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilevers with Single-T Cells or Single-Particle for Immunological Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy
10:06

Functionalization of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilevers with Single-T Cells or Single-Particle for Immunological Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy

Published on: July 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Live Cell Response to Mechanical Stimulation Studied by Integrated Optical and Atomic Force Microscopy
09:20

Live Cell Response to Mechanical Stimulation Studied by Integrated Optical and Atomic Force Microscopy

Published on: October 5, 2010

Imaging of Extracellular Vesicles by Atomic Force Microscopy
10:11

Imaging of Extracellular Vesicles by Atomic Force Microscopy

Published on: September 11, 2019

Functionalization of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilevers with Single-T Cells or Single-Particle for Immunological Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy
10:06

Functionalization of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilevers with Single-T Cells or Single-Particle for Immunological Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy

Published on: July 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cell surface imaging in biophysics
  • Secretory mechanisms in immunology
  • Membrane dynamics in cell biology

Background:

Cell surface structures involved in secretion remain poorly understood. Prior research has shown that secretory processes involve granules and cytoskeletal interactions. However, the exact spatial and temporal relationship between these structures and secretion events is unclear. No prior work had resolved how surface features change during secretion. This gap motivated the use of high-resolution imaging to observe secretion in real time. The role of surface pits in membrane retrieval after stimulation is an open question. Existing models suggest that granules move along cytoskeletal tracks. Yet, how these movements translate to surface-level changes remains unknown. This study addresses these uncertainties by imaging RBL cells during activation.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to observe surface-level changes during secretion in RBL cells. RBL-2H3 cells are known for their secretory activity when stimulated. The study seeks to link surface structures to secretion events. By using scanning force microscopy, the researchers can capture real-time topographic changes. The goal is to determine if surface pits correlate with granule behavior. The study also aims to track how these structures evolve after activation. Understanding these dynamics could clarify the membrane retrieval process. This approach allows for direct observation of secretion-related surface features.

Main Methods:

The researchers used scanning force microscopy to image RBL-2H3 cell surfaces. Cells were activated by cross-linking IgE receptors with dinitrophenol-conjugated BSA. Surface structures were observed under different stimulation conditions. Images were captured at 2, 5, and 35 minutes post-activation. Detergent-extracted cells were analyzed to compare with activated cells. The size and position of surface pits were measured and compared. Topographic changes were tracked over time to assess structural persistence. This method allows for high-resolution imaging of dynamic cell surface events.

Main Results:

Surface structures approximately 1.5 microns in diameter were observed during secretion. These structures appeared at the same time as cell spreading and secretion. Their positions aligned with dense-core granules in unactivated cells. The size of these pits suggested a link to granule movement. Images taken at 2 minutes showed initial formation of the structures. At 5 minutes, the structures remained but showed altered cross-sectional profiles. By 35 minutes, the structures persisted but changed in shape. These findings suggest a possible role in membrane retrieval after stimulation.

Conclusions:

The study suggests that surface pits may be related to secretion in RBL cells. The timing and location of these structures imply a connection to granule behavior. The persistence of these structures over time supports a role in membrane retrieval. The findings align with prior knowledge of granule positioning along cytoskeletal filaments. The authors propose that these structures may be involved in post-stimulation recovery. The study does not confirm causality but suggests a correlation. The results may inform future investigations into secretion mechanisms. These findings contribute to understanding surface-level dynamics during secretion.

The study identifies surface pits approximately 1.5 microns in diameter that appear during secretion.

Scanning force microscopy allows high-resolution imaging of surface changes during and after activation.

The structures align with granule positions and persist after activation, suggesting a role in membrane retrieval.

Structures appear at the same time as secretion and change over time, indicating a dynamic process.

At 2 minutes, structures form; at 5 minutes, they persist but change shape; at 35 minutes, they remain altered.

The authors propose that these structures may be involved in membrane retrieval after intense stimulation.