Thrombolytic therapy of non-cardiac disorders

Patients with a recent (less than 10 days) proximal deep vein thrombosis of the leg or pelvis are candidates for thrombolysis as the major benefit over heparin seems to be the prevention of the postphlebitic limb, an aim which is still not proven in a satisfactory manner. Nonocclusive thrombi appear to lyse more readily than occlusive thrombi. For this indication the optimal dose regimens for the three thrombolytic drugs (streptokinase, urokinase, alteplase) are not established. Acute massive pulmonary embolism with hypotension or shock should be treated with thrombolytic drugs and, pending the outcome in the first hour, be considered for pulmonary embolectomy. Major acute pulmonary embolism with haemodynamic instability responds well to thrombolysis. Whether thrombolysis is superior to heparin in subacute intermediate pulmonary embolism has not been proven unequivocally in terms of mortality or clinically important endpoints. Systemic administration of thrombolytic drugs for peripheral arterial occlusion has been abandoned for catheter-directed and intraoperative intra-arterial repeated bolus or short-term infusions. The efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolytic treatment following a major ischaemic stroke is presently being tested in large scale trials; its use must be restricted to experimental protocols.