Related Experiment Videos
Threshold detection and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments
J A Bell-Krotoski1, E E Fess, J H Figarola
1Rehabilitation Research Department, Gillis W. Long Hansen's Disease Center, Carville, Louisiana 70721-9607, USA.
Summary
Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments are reliable for sensory testing. This study found that variations in filament force within the specified range did not significantly impact accuracy for detecting normal touch thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments offer repeatable sensory testing, crucial for objective clinical assessments.
- Established normal sensory detection thresholds and filament forces by Weinstein, identifying a 0.005-in filament as a key predictor.
- Manufacturer tolerances in filament diameter can lead to variations in applied force, potentially affecting testing accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of small variations in force on the accuracy of the commonly used 2.83 (0.005-in) Semmes-Weinstein monofilament.
- To compare the performance of 2.83 filaments with different mean forces (62 mg vs. 95 mg) from distinct manufacturers.
Main Methods:
- A standard testing protocol was applied to 130 subjects across hands, arms, faces, legs, and feet.
- Six examiners utilized Semmes-Weinstein filaments with measured forces, including heavier and lighter variations.
- Data analysis focused on comparing responses between filament kits and assessing correlations.
Main Results:
- A high correlation in subject responses was observed for the 2.83 filaments within the tested force range.
- Despite overall high correlation, minor differences in sensory detection were noted between filament kits based on testing site and subject age.
- The study confirmed the reliability of the 2.83 filament for normal threshold detection across different manufacturers.
Conclusions:
- Small variations in the force of 2.83 Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, within the specified range, do not significantly compromise their accuracy for normal sensory threshold testing.
- The findings support the continued use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments as a dependable tool for objective sensory evaluation in clinical settings.
- Further investigation into site- and age-specific differences may refine the application of sensory testing protocols.